PURPOSE: To investigate the accumulated dose deviations to tumors and normal tissues in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and investigate their geometric causes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty previously treated liver cancer patients were retrospectively evaluated. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was planned on the static exhale CT for 27-60 Gy in 6 fractions, and patients were treated in free-breathing with daily cone-beam CT guidance. Biomechanical model-based deformable image registration accumulated dose over both the planning four-dimensional (4D) CT (predicted breathing dose) and also over each fraction's respiratory-correlated cone-beam CT (accumulated treatment dose). The contribution of different geometric errors to changes between the accumulated and predicted breathing dose were quantified. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (70%) had accumulated dose deviations relative to the planned static prescription dose >5%, ranging from -15% to 5% in tumors and -42% to 8% in normal tissues. Sixteen patients (53%) still had deviations relative to the 4D CT-predicted dose, which were similar in magnitude. Thirty-two tissues in these 16 patients had deviations >5% relative to the 4D CT-predicted dose, and residual setup errors (n = 17) were most often the largest cause of the deviations, followed by deformations (n = 8) and breathing variations (n = 7). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients had accumulated dose deviations >5% relative to the static plan. Significant deviations relative to the predicted breathing dose still occurred in more than half the patients, commonly owing to residual setup errors. Accumulated SBRT dose may be warranted to pursue further dose escalation, adaptive SBRT, and aid in correlation with clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE: To investigate the accumulated dose deviations to tumors and normal tissues in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and investigate their geometric causes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty previously treated liver cancerpatients were retrospectively evaluated. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was planned on the static exhale CT for 27-60 Gy in 6 fractions, and patients were treated in free-breathing with daily cone-beam CT guidance. Biomechanical model-based deformable image registration accumulated dose over both the planning four-dimensional (4D) CT (predicted breathing dose) and also over each fraction's respiratory-correlated cone-beam CT (accumulated treatment dose). The contribution of different geometric errors to changes between the accumulated and predicted breathing dose were quantified. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (70%) had accumulated dose deviations relative to the planned static prescription dose >5%, ranging from -15% to 5% in tumors and -42% to 8% in normal tissues. Sixteen patients (53%) still had deviations relative to the 4D CT-predicted dose, which were similar in magnitude. Thirty-two tissues in these 16 patients had deviations >5% relative to the 4D CT-predicted dose, and residual setup errors (n = 17) were most often the largest cause of the deviations, followed by deformations (n = 8) and breathing variations (n = 7). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients had accumulated dose deviations >5% relative to the static plan. Significant deviations relative to the predicted breathing dose still occurred in more than half the patients, commonly owing to residual setup errors. Accumulated SBRT dose may be warranted to pursue further dose escalation, adaptive SBRT, and aid in correlation with clinical outcomes.
Authors: Maria A Hawkins; Kristy K Brock; Cynthia Eccles; Douglas Moseley; David Jaffray; Laura A Dawson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alan W Katz; Madeleine Carey-Sampson; Ann G Muhs; Michael T Milano; Michael C Schell; Paul Okunieff Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-12-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Cynthia L Eccles; Tim Craig; Michael B Sharpe; Laura A Dawson; Kristy K Brock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Edgar Ben-Josef; Daniel Normolle; William D Ensminger; Suzette Walker; Daniel Tatro; Randall K Ten Haken; James Knol; Laura A Dawson; Charlie Pan; Theodore S Lawrence Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mihaela Rosu; Laura A Dawson; James M Balter; Daniel L McShan; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Valentina Giacometti; Raymond B King; Christina E Agnew; Denise M Irvine; Suneil Jain; Alan R Hounsell; Conor K McGarry Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Fabian Weykamp; Philipp Hoegen; Sebastian Klüter; C Katharina Spindeldreier; Laila König; Katharina Seidensaal; Sebastian Regnery; Jakob Liermann; Carolin Rippke; Stefan A Koerber; Carolin Buchele; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Theresa Voglhuber; Kerstin A Eitz; Markus Oechsner; Marco M E Vogel; Stephanie E Combs Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Unjin A Yeo; Michael L Taylor; Jeremy R Supple; Shankar Siva; Tomas Kron; Daniel Pham; Rick D Franich Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 2.102