Literature DB >> 22201644

Naive and primed murine pluripotent stem cells have distinct miRNA expression profiles.

Alice Jouneau1, Constance Ciaudo, Odile Sismeiro, Vincent Brochard, Luc Jouneau, Sandrine Vandormael-Pournin, Jean-Yves Coppée, Qi Zhou, Edith Heard, Christophe Antoniewski, Michel Cohen-Tannoudji.   

Abstract

Over the last years, the microRNA (miRNA) pathway has emerged as a key component of the regulatory network of pluripotency. Although clearly distinct states of pluripotency have been described in vivo and ex vivo, differences in miRNA expression profiles associated with the developmental modulation of pluripotency have not been extensively studied so far. Here, we performed deep sequencing to profile miRNA expression in naive (embryonic stem cell [ESC]) and primed (epiblast stem cell [EpiSC]) pluripotent stem cells derived from mouse embryos of identical genetic background. We developed a graphical representation method allowing the rapid identification of miRNAs with an atypical profile including mirtrons, a small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA)-derived miRNA, and miRNAs whose biogenesis may differ between ESC and EpiSC. Comparison of mature miRNA profiles revealed that ESCs and EpiSCs exhibit very different miRNA signatures with one third of miRNAs being differentially expressed between the two cell types. Notably, differential expression of several clusters, including miR290-295, miR17-92, miR302/367, and a large repetitive cluster on chromosome 2, was observed. Our analysis also showed that differentiation priming of EpiSC compared to ESC is evidenced by changes in miRNA expression. These dynamic changes in miRNAs signature are likely to reflect both redundant and specific roles of miRNAs in the fine-tuning of pluripotency during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22201644      PMCID: PMC3264912          DOI: 10.1261/rna.028878.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  48 in total

Review 1.  Epiblast stem cells contribute new insight into pluripotency and gastrulation.

Authors:  Josh G Chenoweth; Ronald D G McKay; Paul J Tesar
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 2.053

Review 2.  Naive and primed pluripotent states.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency.

Authors:  Ge Guo; Jian Yang; Jennifer Nichols; John Simon Hall; Isobel Eyres; William Mansfield; Austin Smith
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Conserved and divergent roles of FGF signaling in mouse epiblast stem cells and human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Boris Greber; Guangming Wu; Christof Bernemann; Jin Young Joo; Dong Wook Han; Kinarm Ko; Natalia Tapia; Davood Sabour; Jared Sterneckert; Paul Tesar; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Effie Apostolou; Hidenori Akutsu; Atsushi Fukuda; Patricia Follett; Sridaran Natesan; Tomohiro Kono; Toshi Shioda; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-Seq analysis.

Authors:  Fuchou Tang; Catalin Barbacioru; Siqin Bao; Caroline Lee; Ellen Nordman; Xiaohui Wang; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs promote induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Robert L Judson; Joshua E Babiarz; Monica Venere; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Nuclear transfer-derived epiblast stem cells are transcriptionally and epigenetically distinguishable from their fertilized-derived counterparts.

Authors:  Julien Maruotti; Xiang Peng Dai; Vincent Brochard; Luc Jouneau; Jun Liu; Amélie Bonnet-Garnier; Hélène Jammes; Ludovic Vallier; I Gabrielle M Brons; Roger Pedersen; Jean-Paul Renard; Qi Zhou; Alice Jouneau
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Ago2 immunoprecipitation identifies predicted microRNAs in human embryonic stem cells and neural precursors.

Authors:  Loyal A Goff; Jonathan Davila; Mavis R Swerdel; Jennifer C Moore; Rick I Cohen; Hao Wu; Yi E Sun; Ronald P Hart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Siqin Bao; Fuchou Tang; Xihe Li; Katsuhiko Hayashi; Astrid Gillich; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  50 in total

1.  DNA methylation is dispensable for changes in global chromatin architecture but required for chromocentre formation in early stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Vahideh Hassan-Zadeh; Peter Rugg-Gunn; David P Bazett-Jones
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Two miRNA clusters reveal alternative paths in late-stage reprogramming.

Authors:  Ronald J Parchem; Julia Ye; Robert L Judson; Marie F LaRussa; Raga Krishnakumar; Amy Blelloch; Michael C Oldham; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Transcriptomics and proteomics in stem cell research.

Authors:  Hai Wang; Qian Zhang; Xiangdong Fang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Stable methylation at promoters distinguishes epiblast stem cells from embryonic stem cells and the in vivo epiblasts.

Authors:  Anne-Clémence Veillard; Hendrik Marks; Andreia Sofia Bernardo; Luc Jouneau; Denis Laloë; Laurent Boulanger; Anita Kaan; Vincent Brochard; Matteo Tosolini; Roger Pedersen; Henk Stunnenberg; Alice Jouneau
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  miRNA control of tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Subhadip Ghatak
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Outside the coding genome, mammalian microRNAs confer structural and functional complexity.

Authors:  Virginie Olive; Alex C Minella; Lin He
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 8.192

7.  Comparative gene expression signature of pig, human and mouse induced pluripotent stem cell lines reveals insight into pig pluripotency gene networks.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Yangyang Ma; Jeong-Yeh Yang; De Cheng; Xiaopeng Liu; Xiaoling Ma; Franklin D West; Huayan Wang
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 8.  Noncoding RNAs in the Regulation of Pluripotency and Reprogramming.

Authors:  Vladimir V Sherstyuk; Sergey P Medvedev; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Sodium butyrate promotes generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells through induction of the miR302/367 cluster.

Authors:  Zhonghui Zhang; Wen-Shu Wu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  FOXD3 Regulates Pluripotent Stem Cell Potential by Simultaneously Initiating and Repressing Enhancer Activity.

Authors:  Raga Krishnakumar; Amy F Chen; Marisol G Pantovich; Muhammad Danial; Ronald J Parchem; Patricia A Labosky; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 24.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.