Literature DB >> 19224983

Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency.

Ge Guo1, Jian Yang, Jennifer Nichols, John Simon Hall, Isobel Eyres, William Mansfield, Austin Smith.   

Abstract

Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from pluripotent early epiblast contribute functionally differentiated progeny to all foetal lineages of chimaeras. By contrast, epistem cell (EpiSC) lines from post-implantation epithelialised epiblast are unable to colonise the embryo even though they express the core pluripotency genes Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. We examined interconversion between these two cell types. ES cells can readily become EpiSCs in response to growth factor cues. By contrast, EpiSCs do not change into ES cells. We exploited PiggyBac transposition to introduce a single reprogramming factor, Klf4, into EpiSCs. No effect was apparent in EpiSC culture conditions, but in ground state ES cell conditions a fraction of cells formed undifferentiated colonies. These EpiSC-derived induced pluripotent stem (Epi-iPS) cells activated expression of ES cell-specific transcripts including endogenous Klf4, and downregulated markers of lineage specification. X chromosome silencing in female cells, a feature of the EpiSC state, was erased in Epi-iPS cells. They produced high-contribution chimaeras that yielded germline transmission. These properties were maintained after Cre-mediated deletion of the Klf4 transgene, formally demonstrating complete and stable reprogramming of developmental phenotype. Thus, re-expression of Klf4 in an appropriate environment can regenerate the naïve ground state from EpiSCs. Reprogramming is dependent on suppression of extrinsic growth factor stimuli and proceeds to completion in less than 1% of cells. This substantiates the argument that EpiSCs are developmentally, epigenetically and functionally differentiated from ES cells. However, because a single transgene is the minimum requirement to attain the ground state, EpiSCs offer an attractive opportunity for screening for unknown components of the reprogramming process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224983      PMCID: PMC2685927          DOI: 10.1242/dev.030957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  36 in total

1.  Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes.

Authors:  Jose Silva; Winifred Mak; Ilona Zvetkova; Ruth Appanah; Tatyana B Nesterova; Zoe Webster; Antoine H F M Peters; Thomas Jenuwein; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Defined conditions for neural commitment and differentiation.

Authors:  Qi-Long Ying; Austin G Smith
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Stem cells and early lineage development.

Authors:  Janet Rossant
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Investigation of the potency of cells from the postimplantation mouse embryo by blastocyst injection: a preliminary report.

Authors:  J Rossant; R L Gardner; H L Alexandre
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1978-12

5.  Investigation of the fate of 4-5 day post-coitum mouse inner cell mass cells by blastocyst injection.

Authors:  R L Gardner; J Rossant
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1979-08

Review 6.  Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men.

Authors:  A G Smith
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.827

7.  Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  A Bradley; M Evans; M H Kaufman; E Robertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 May 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos.

Authors:  M J Evans; M H Kaufman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells.

Authors:  G R Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3.

Authors:  Qi Long Ying; Jennifer Nichols; Ian Chambers; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  331 in total

Review 1.  Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Martin F Pera; Patrick P L Tam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Molecular insights into the heterogeneity of telomere reprogramming in induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Yu Yin; Xiaoying Ye; Kai Liu; Haiying Zhu; Lingling Wang; Maria Chiourea; Maja Okuka; Guangzhen Ji; Jiameng Dan; Bingfeng Zuo; Minshu Li; Qian Zhang; Na Liu; Lingyi Chen; Xinghua Pan; Sarantis Gagos; David L Keefe; Lin Liu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 3.  Mechanism and methods to induce pluripotency.

Authors:  Peizhe Wang; Jie Na
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Epigenetic reprogramming: Prdm14 hits the accelerator.

Authors:  Niels Geijsen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Tracing the genesis of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Ariel Pribluda; Jacob H Hanna
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Delineating nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Jolene Ooi; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 14.870

7.  Engineering artificial signaling centers to polarize embryoid body differentiation.

Authors:  Dorthe R Petersen; Carsten Gustavsen; Søren R Lindskog; Mark A Magnuson; Kenneth S Zaret; Palle Serup
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.272

8.  Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types.

Authors:  Tyrone Ryba; Ichiro Hiratani; Junjie Lu; Mari Itoh; Michael Kulik; Jinfeng Zhang; Thomas C Schulz; Allan J Robins; Stephen Dalton; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Concise Review: Lessons from Naïve Human Pluripotent Cells.

Authors:  Carol B Ware
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 6.277

10.  Tankyrase inhibition promotes a stable human naïve pluripotent state with improved functionality.

Authors:  Ludovic Zimmerlin; Tea Soon Park; Jeffrey S Huo; Karan Verma; Sarshan R Pather; C Conover Talbot; Jasmin Agarwal; Diana Steppan; Yang W Zhang; Michael Considine; Hong Guo; Xiufeng Zhong; Christian Gutierrez; Leslie Cope; M Valeria Canto-Soler; Alan D Friedman; Stephen B Baylin; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.