Literature DB >> 22198037

Looking different, feeling different: women's reactions to risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgery.

Nina Hallowell1, Brandi Baylock, Louise Heiniger, Phyllis N Butow, Deepa Patel, Bettina Meiser, Christobel Saunders, Melanie A Price.   

Abstract

Most studies of quality of life following risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and mastectomy (RRM) for inherited breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility were conducted before counseling protocols were established and included women at varying times since surgery. This study aimed to overcome these deficiencies and to provide current data on outcomes for this growing group of women. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the experiences of an Australian cohort of 40 high-risk women 3 years after they underwent RRM and/or RRSO. Data were analyzed using the method of constant comparison. 19/40 women underwent RRSO, 8/40 RRM and 13/40 both procedures. Two themes-looking different and feeling different-captured the psychosocial impact of surgery upon interviewees. All regarded RR surgery as a positive experience and were relieved at having their risks of cancer substantially reduced; however, reducing risk by removing these body parts is not without costs. In addition to relief interviewees also reported experiencing a range of negative emotions and a range of unexpected bodily sensations following surgery and reflected upon both positive and negative changes in their appearance. Women said they had been unprepared for the lack of sensation in reconstructed breasts and/or the severity of menopausal symptoms, which often had a negative impact upon sexuality. At-risk women regard RR surgery as a positive way to manage cancer risk. However, although women who currently undergo RR surgery are informed about its sequelae, few are entirely prepared for the reality of undergoing this procedure. We recommend that women who undergo these procedures should be provided with information supported by psychosocial input before and after RR surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22198037     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9504-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  38 in total

1.  A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Ann M Geiger; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lisa J Herrinton; Sharon J Rolnick; Sarah M Greene; Carmen N West; Emily L Harris; Joann G Elmore; Andrea Altschuler; In-Liu A Liu; Suzanne W Fletcher; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Family history of cancer and cancer risks in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Kelly Metcalfe; Jan Lubinski; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Susan Neuhausen; Nadine Tung; Barry Rosen; Jacek Gronwald; Peter Ainsworth; Kevin Sweet; Andrea Eisen; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Amy McGaughey
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rongwei Fu; Jessica C Griffin; Peggy Nygren; M E Beth Smith; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  What women wish they knew before prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon J Rolnick; Andrea Altschuler; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Joann G Elmore; Sarah M Greene; Emily L Harris; Lisa J Herrinton; Mary B Barton; Ann M Geiger; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yvonne Brandberg; Kerstin Sandelin; Staffan Erikson; Göran Jurell; Annelie Liljegren; Annika Lindblom; Ann Lindén; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Marie Wickman; Brita Arver
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  21 in total

1.  Distinctive psychological and social experiences of women choosing prophylactic oophorectomy for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Rachel Meadows; Tasleem J Padamsee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2018-02-02

2.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Addressing sexual dysfunction after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: effects of a brief, psychosexual intervention.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Christopher J Recklitis; Jennifer Bakan; Judy E Garber; Andrea F Patenaude
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Cancer risk management in Tasmanian women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Stephanie Kearton; Karen Wills; Michael Bunting; Penny Blomfield; Paul A James; Jo Burke
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Experience of Norwegian Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation-Carrying Participants in Educational Support Groups: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Marion Myklebust; Eva Gjengedal; Nina Strømsvik
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Relationship satisfaction predicts sexual activity following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Tierney Lorenz; Bonnie McGregor; Elizabeth Swisher
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.949

8.  Influences on Satisfaction with Reconstructed Breasts and Intimacy in Younger Women Following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: a Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-08

9.  The Psychosocial Impact of Undergoing Prophylactic Total Gastrectomy (PTG) to Manage the Risk of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC).

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Julia Lawton; Shirlene Badger; Sue Richardson; Richard H Hardwick; Carlos Caldas; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Barriers and facilitators to CDH1 carriers contemplating or undergoing prophylactic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kaitlin M McGarragle; Tae L Hart; Carol Swallow; Savtaj Brar; Anand Govindarajan; Zane Cohen; Melyssa Aronson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.