Literature DB >> 29319429

Distinctive psychological and social experiences of women choosing prophylactic oophorectomy for cancer prevention.

Rachel Meadows1, Tasleem J Padamsee2, Electra D Paskett3.   

Abstract

Women known to have significantly elevated ovarian cancer risk due to genetic mutations or family history can reduce this risk by surgically removing both ovaries and fallopian tubes (RRBSO, risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). We used interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) to explore the psychosocial experiences of women who chose RRBSO for cancer prevention. We extended the traditional use of IPA to compare the experiences of women who chose RRBSO for cancer prevention to those of women who underwent similar gynecologic surgery for benign indications. The analysis resulted in three superordinate themes describing women's psychosocial experiences related to RRBSO: (a) psychological facets of cancer risk (b) social support and (c) shared medical decision making. Findings illustrate that women choosing RRBSO for cancer prevention experience heightened psychosocial challenges before and after surgery compared to women undergoing surgery for benign indication. Furthermore, they may need distinct types of information and support from healthcare providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29319429      PMCID: PMC6082146          DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1424855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Women Int        ISSN: 0739-9332


  23 in total

1.  Surveillance or surgery? A description of the factors that influence high risk premenopausal women's decisions about prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell; I Jacobs; M Richards; J Mackay; M Gore
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  The impact of social and personal resources on psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Mariska den Heijer; Joël Vos; Caroline Seynaeve; Kathleen Vanheusden; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Endocrine aspects of women's sexual function.

Authors:  Margaret E Wierman; Rossella E Nappi; Nancy Avis; Susan R Davis; Ferdinand Labrie; Willam Rosner; Jan L Shifren
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  The impact of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery in premenopausal women at high risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer due to Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Ramona Moldovan; Sianan Keating; Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

Review 6.  Quality of life and health status after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in women who carry a BRCA mutation: A review.

Authors:  Amy Finch; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Maximising survival: the main concern of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Lisa Jeffers; Patrick J Morrison; Eilis McCaughan; Donna Fitzsimons
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.398

9.  The loss of a mother and dealing with genetic cancer risk: women who have undergone prophylactic removal of the ovaries.

Authors:  Marie Kvamme Mæland; Elin Overaa Eriksen; Oddgeir Synnes
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.398

Review 10.  Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-11-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Megan Hils; Anna Muraveva
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Barriers and facilitators to CDH1 carriers contemplating or undergoing prophylactic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kaitlin M McGarragle; Tae L Hart; Carol Swallow; Savtaj Brar; Anand Govindarajan; Zane Cohen; Melyssa Aronson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.375

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.