Literature DB >> 28257585

Increased Response to Altered Auditory Feedback in Dyslexia: A Weaker Sensorimotor Magnet Implied in the Phonological Deficit.

Mark R van den Bunt1, Margriet A Groen1, Takayuki Ito2, Ana A Francisco1, Vincent L Gracco3, Ken R Pugh4, Ludo Verhoeven1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether developmental dyslexia (DD) is characterized by deficiencies in speech sensory and motor feedforward and feedback mechanisms, which are involved in the modulation of phonological representations. Method: A total of 42 adult native speakers of Dutch (22 adults with DD; 20 participants who were typically reading controls) were asked to produce /bep/ while the first formant (F1) of the /e/ was not altered (baseline), increased (ramp), held at maximal perturbation (hold), and not altered again (after-effect). The F1 of the produced utterance was measured for each trial and used for statistical analyses. The measured F1s produced during each phase were entered in a linear mixed-effects model.
Results: Participants with DD adapted more strongly during the ramp phase and returned to baseline to a lesser extent when feedback was back to normal (after-effect phase) when compared with the typically reading group. In this study, a faster deviation from baseline during the ramp phase, a stronger adaptation response during the hold phase, and a slower return to baseline during the after-effect phase were associated with poorer reading and phonological abilities.
Conclusion: The data of the current study are consistent with the notion that the phonological deficit in DD is associated with a weaker sensorimotor magnet for phonological representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257585      PMCID: PMC5544192          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  77 in total

1.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation.

Authors:  F H Guenther; M N Gjaja
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Plasticity in the human speech motor system drives changes in speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Emily Neufeld; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The effect of talker and intonation variability on speech perception in noise in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Valerie Hazan; Souhila Messaoud-Galusi; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Lombard sign as a function of age and task.

Authors:  D K Amazi; S R Garber
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1982-12

5.  Phonological awareness and types of sound errors in preschoolers with speech sound disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan Preston; Mary Louise Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

7.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Non-word repetition in Dutch children with (a risk of) dyslexia and SLI.

Authors:  Elise de Bree; Judith Rispens; Ellen Gerrits
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.346

9.  Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders?

Authors:  Hugh W Catts; Suzanne M Adlof; Tiffany P Hogan; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Speech production deficits in early readers: predictors of risk.

Authors:  Judith G Foy; Virginia A Mann
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2011-02-17
View more
  4 in total

1.  Pediatric Responses to Fundamental and Formant Frequency Altered Auditory Feedback: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Caitlin Coughler; Keelia L Quinn de Launay; David W Purcell; Janis Oram Cardy; Deryk S Beal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Abnormal Speech Motor Control in Individuals with 16p11.2 Deletions.

Authors:  Carly Demopoulos; Hardik Kothare; Danielle Mizuiri; Jennifer Henderson-Sabes; Brieana Fregeau; Jennifer Tjernagel; John F Houde; Elliott H Sherr; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  A Simple 3-Parameter Model for Examining Adaptation in Speech and Voice Production.

Authors:  Elaine Kearney; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Hasini R Weerathunge; Riccardo Falsini; Ayoub Daliri; Defne Abur; Kirrie J Ballard; Soo-Eun Chang; Sara-Ching Chao; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Terri L Scott; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-21

4.  The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech.

Authors:  João Araújo; Sheila Flanagan; Alexandre Castro-Caldas; Usha Goswami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.