Literature DB >> 22191806

Variables associated with successful intubation attempts using video laryngoscopy: a preliminary report in a helicopter emergency medical service.

Jestin N Carlson1, Jorge Quintero, Francis X Guyette, Clifton W Callaway, James J Menegazzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated varying rates of successful endotracheal intubation (ETI). Until the application of video laryngoscopy, little information regarding prehospital intubation could be analyzed objectively by individuals other than the provider performing the ETI.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of variables recorded during video laryngoscopy and successful ETI attempts, defined as placing the endotracheal tube in the trachea.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed intubations performed by a single helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) using a video larygoscope from March 1, 2010, to October 1, 2010. All videos were de-identified and analyzed by a single researcher. Time intervals (e.g., attempt time) and intubation process variables (e.g., Cormack-Lehane [C-L] view) were abstracted from all videos. Time intervals were begun when the laryngoscope blade passed the lips and entered the oral cavity (entry). We describe variables using means and standard deviations (continuous), medians with interquartile ranges (ordinal), and percentages with 95% confidence intervals (categorical). We then looked at univariate associations between these variables and ETI success using logistic regression.
RESULTS: We recorded 116 intubations during the study period. Twenty-nine recordings were either incomplete (n = 26) or of insufficient quality for analysis (n = 3). The remaining 87 videos represented 87 different patients with a total of 102 attempts at laryngoscopy. Thirty-six providers performed 64 cases, with the majority of providers (n = 21) performing only one intubation. The first-pass success rate in this series was 76% (n = 66), with 98% success within three attempts. Successful ETI attempts had lower entry-to-percentage of glottic opening (POGO) times (16.6 sec vs. 32.1 sec, p = 0.013), entry-to-first view of the endotracheal tube or entry-to-tube times (17.6 sec vs. 27.4 sec, p = 0.04), higher POGO scores (76 vs. 39, p < 0.001), and a lower C-L view (one vs. three, p < 0.001). Recognized esophageal intubation was more likely to occur during unsuccessful ETI attempts (43% vs. 8%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Video laryngoscopy can measure multiple components of ETI performance. Successful ETI attempts have significantly shorter entry-to-POGO times and entry-to-tube times, obtain better views of the glottic opening (POGO and C-L view), and have a lower incidence of recognized esophageal intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22191806      PMCID: PMC3603855          DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2011.640764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading.

Authors:  E A Ochroch; J E Hollander; S Kush; F S Shofer; R M Levitan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Out-of-hospital airway management in the United States.

Authors:  Henry E Wang; N Clay Mann; Gregory Mears; Karen Jacobson; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale.

Authors:  R M Levitan; E A Ochroch; S Kush; F S Shofer; J E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Critical hemoglobin desaturation will occur before return to an unparalyzed state following 1 mg/kg intravenous succinylcholine.

Authors:  J L Benumof; R Dagg; R Benumof
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Prehospital endotracheal intubation: rationale for training emergency medical personnel.

Authors:  P E Pepe; M K Copass; T H Joyce
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R S Cormack; J Lehane
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Field endotracheal intubation by paramedical personnel. Success rates and complications.

Authors:  R D Stewart; P M Paris; P M Winter; G H Pelton; G M Cannon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Defining the learning curve for paramedic student endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Henry E Wang; Samuel R Seitz; David Hostler; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  How many attempts are required to accomplish out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation?

Authors:  Henry E Wang; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  The effect of paramedic rapid sequence intubation on outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daniel P Davis; David B Hoyt; Mel Ochs; Dale Fortlage; Troy Holbrook; Lawrence K Marshall; Peter Rosen
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2003-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Motion capture measures variability in laryngoscopic movement during endotracheal intubation: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jestin N Carlson; Samarjit Das; Fernando De la Torre; Clifton W Callaway; Paul E Phrampus; Jessica Hodgins
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Impact of Video Laryngoscopy on Advanced Airway Management by Critical Care Transport Paramedics and Nurses Using the CMAC Pocket Monitor.

Authors:  Bradley Boehringer; Michael Choate; Shelley Hurwitz; Peter V R Tilney; Thomas Judge
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Assessment of Movement Patterns during Intubation between Novice and Experienced Providers Using Mobile Sensors: A Preliminary, Proof of Concept Study.

Authors:  Jestin N Carlson; Samarjit Das; Stephanie Spring; Adam Frisch; Fernando De la Torre; Jessica Hodgins
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Truview EVO2 and standard Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparative randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Ewelina Gaszynska; Tomasz Gaszynski
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Intubating Adult Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Jestin N Carlson; Jason Crofts; Ron M Walls; Calvin A Brown
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Analysis of tracheal intubation in out-of-hospital helicopter emergency medicine recorded by video laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Jürgen Knapp; Bettina Eberle; Michael Bernhard; Lorenz Theiler; Urs Pietsch; Roland Albrecht
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Video screen visualization patterns when using a video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Preston Dean; Benjamin Kerrey
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Video laryngoscopy in pre-hospital critical care - a quality improvement study.

Authors:  Marianne Grønnebæk Rhode; Mads Partridge Vandborg; Vibeke Bladt; Leif Rognås
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.953

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.