Jürgen Knapp1, Bettina Eberle2,3, Michael Bernhard4, Lorenz Theiler5,6, Urs Pietsch6,7, Roland Albrecht6,7. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. juergen.knapp@insel.ch. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland. 4. Emergency Department, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 5. Department of Anaesthesiology, Cantonal Hospital of Aargau, Aarau, Switzerland. 6. Swiss Air Rescue, Rega, Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation remains the gold standard of airway management in emergency medicine and maximizing safety, intubation success, and especially first-pass intubation success (FPS) in these situations is imperative. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on all 12 helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) bases of the Swiss Air Rescue, between February 15, 2018, and February 14, 2019. All 428 patients on whom out-of-hospital advanced airway management was performed by the HEMS crew were included. The C-MAC video laryngoscope was used as the primary device for tracheal intubation. Intubation procedures were recorded by the video laryngoscope and precise time points were recorded to verify the time necessary for each attempt and the overall procedure time until successful intubation. The videos were further analysed for problems and complications during airway management by an independent reviewer. Additionally, a questionnaire about the intubation procedure, basic characteristics of the patient, circumstances, environmental factors, and the provider's level of experience in airway management was filled out. Main outcome measures were FPS of tracheal intubation, overall success rate, overall intubation time, problems and complications of video laryngoscopy. RESULTS: FPS rate was 87.6% and overall success rate 98.6%. Success rates, overall time to intubation, and subjective difficulty were not associated to the providers' expertise in airway management. In patients undergoing CPR FPS was 84.8%, in trauma patients 86.4% and in non-trauma patients 93.3%. FPS in patients with difficult airway characteristics, facial trauma/burns or obesity ranges between 87 and 89%. Performing airway management indoors or inside an ambulance resulted in a significantly higher FPS of 91.1% compared to outdoor locations (p < 0.001). Direct solar irradiation on the screen, fogging of the lens, and blood on the camera significantly impaired FPS. Several issues for further improvements in the use of video laryngoscopy in the out-of-hospital setting and for quality control in airway management were identified. CONCLUSION: Airway management using the C-MAC video laryngoscope with Macintosh blade in a group of operators with mixed experience showed high FPS and overall rates of intubation success. Video recording emergency intubations may improve education and quality control.
BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation remains the gold standard of airway management in emergency medicine and maximizing safety, intubation success, and especially first-pass intubation success (FPS) in these situations is imperative. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on all 12 helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) bases of the Swiss Air Rescue, between February 15, 2018, and February 14, 2019. All 428 patients on whom out-of-hospital advanced airway management was performed by the HEMS crew were included. The C-MAC video laryngoscope was used as the primary device for tracheal intubation. Intubation procedures were recorded by the video laryngoscope and precise time points were recorded to verify the time necessary for each attempt and the overall procedure time until successful intubation. The videos were further analysed for problems and complications during airway management by an independent reviewer. Additionally, a questionnaire about the intubation procedure, basic characteristics of the patient, circumstances, environmental factors, and the provider's level of experience in airway management was filled out. Main outcome measures were FPS of tracheal intubation, overall success rate, overall intubation time, problems and complications of video laryngoscopy. RESULTS: FPS rate was 87.6% and overall success rate 98.6%. Success rates, overall time to intubation, and subjective difficulty were not associated to the providers' expertise in airway management. In patients undergoing CPR FPS was 84.8%, in traumapatients 86.4% and in non-traumapatients 93.3%. FPS in patients with difficult airway characteristics, facial trauma/burns or obesity ranges between 87 and 89%. Performing airway management indoors or inside an ambulance resulted in a significantly higher FPS of 91.1% compared to outdoor locations (p < 0.001). Direct solar irradiation on the screen, fogging of the lens, and blood on the camera significantly impaired FPS. Several issues for further improvements in the use of video laryngoscopy in the out-of-hospital setting and for quality control in airway management were identified. CONCLUSION: Airway management using the C-MAC video laryngoscope with Macintosh blade in a group of operators with mixed experience showed high FPS and overall rates of intubation success. Video recording emergency intubations may improve education and quality control.
Authors: Jestin N Carlson; Jorge Quintero; Francis X Guyette; Clifton W Callaway; James J Menegazzi Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Hiromichi Naito; Francis X Guyette; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton W Callaway Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: M Gellerfors; E Fevang; A Bäckman; A Krüger; S Mikkelsen; J Nurmi; L Rognås; E Sandström; G Skallsjö; C Svensén; D Gryth; H M Lossius Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Silas Houghton Budd; Eleanor Alexander-Elborough; Richard Brandon; Chris Fudge; Scott Hardy; Laura Hopkins; Ben Paul; Sloane Philips; Sarah Thatcher; Paul Winsor Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2021-11-20
Authors: Urs Pietsch; Raphael Müllner; Lorenz Theiler; Volker Wenzel; Lorenz Meuli; Jürgen Knapp; Stephen J M Sollid; Roland Albrecht Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2022-02-08