Literature DB >> 22189351

The polypill in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cost-effectiveness in the Dutch population.

Paul F van Gils1, Eelco A B Over, Heleen H Hamberg-van Reenen, G Ardine de Wit, Matthijs van den Berg, Albertine J Schuit, Peter M Engelfriet.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the present study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the polypill in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Design A health economic modelling study. Setting Primary healthcare in the Netherlands. Participants Simulated individuals from the general Dutch population, aged 45-75 years. Interventions Opportunistic screening followed by prescription of the polypill to eligible individuals. Eligibility was defined as having a minimum 10-year risk of cardiovascular death as assessed with the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation function of alternatively 5%, 7.5% or 10%. Different versions of the polypill were considered, depending on composition: (1) the Indian polycap, with three different types of blood pressure-lowering drugs, a statin and aspirin; (2) as (1) but without aspirin and (3) as (2) but with a double statin dose. In addition, a scenario of (targeted) separate antihypertensive and/or statin medication was simulated. Primary outcome measures Cases of acute myocardial infarction or stroke prevented, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and the costs per QALY gained. All interventions were compared with usual care. Results All scenarios were cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between €7900 and 12 300 per QALY compared with usual care. Most health gains were achieved with the polypill without aspirin and containing a double dose of statins. With a 10-year risk of 7.5% as the threshold, this pill would prevent approximately 3.5% of all cardiovascular events. Conclusions Opportunistic screening based on global cardiovascular risk assessment followed by polypill prescription to those with increased risk offers a cost-effective strategy. Most health gain is achieved by the polypill without aspirin and a double statin dose.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22189351      PMCID: PMC3278482          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  41 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins.

Authors:  T-C Weng; Y-H Kao Yang; S-J Lin; S-H Tai
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 2.  The polypill in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: key concepts, current status, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Eva Lonn; Jackie Bosch; Koon K Teo; Prem Pais; Denis Xavier; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).

Authors:  Ian Graham; Dan Atar; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Gudrun Boysen; Gunilla Burell; Renata Cifkova; Jean Dallongeville; Guy De Backer; Shah Ebrahim; Bjørn Gjelsvik; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Arno Hoes; Steve Humphries; Mike Knapton; Joep Perk; Silvia G Priori; Kalevi Pyorala; Zeljko Reiner; Luis Ruilope; Susana Sans-Menendez; Wilma Scholte Op Reimer; Peter Weissberg; David Wood; John Yarnell; Jose Luis Zamorano; Edmond Walma; Tony Fitzgerald; Marie Therese Cooney; Alexandra Dudina; Alex Vahanian; John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Christian Funck-Brentano; Gerasimos Filippatos; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; Jóse Luis Zamorano; Attila Altiner; Enzo Bonora; Paul N Durrington; Robert Fagard; Simona Giampaoli; Harry Hemingway; Jan Hakansson; Sverre Erik Kjeldsen; Mogens Lytken Larsen; Giuseppe Mancia; Athanasios J Manolis; Kristina Orth-Gomer; Terje Pedersen; Mike Rayner; Lars Ryden; Mario Sammut; Neil Schneiderman; Anton F Stalenhoef; Lale Tokgözoglu; Olov Wiklund; Antonis Zampelas
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2007-09

4.  [Cost-effectiveness of prevention: opportunities for public health policy in the Netherlands].

Authors:  M van den Berg; G A de Wit; S M C Vijgen; M C M Busch; A J Schuit
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2008-06-07

5.  Effects of a polypill (Polycap) on risk factors in middle-aged individuals without cardiovascular disease (TIPS): a phase II, double-blind, randomised trial.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Pais; R Afzal; D Xavier; K Teo; J Eikelboom; A Sigamani; V Mohan; R Gupta; N Thomas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Maria C Roncaglioni; Fausto Avanzini; Ierta Pangrazzi; Gianni Tognoni; David L Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Non-adherence to statin therapy: a major challenge for preventive cardiology.

Authors:  T R Bates; V M Connaughton; G F Watts
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.889

8.  Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Hayden; Michael Pignone; Christopher Phillips; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%.

Authors:  N J Wald; M R Law
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-28

10.  Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in modelling the cost effectiveness of various interventions for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Laura T Burgers; William K Redekop; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Polypill: an affordable strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention in low-medium-income countries.

Authors:  Patricio López-Jaramillo; Silvia González-Gómez; Diego Zarate-Bernal; Andrés Serrano; Leonor Atuesta; Christian Clausen; Claudia Castro-Valencia; Paul Camacho-Lopez; Johanna Otero
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-16

3.  Randomized Polypill crossover trial in people aged 50 and over.

Authors:  David S Wald; Joan K Morris; Nicholas J Wald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Stroke survivors', caregivers' and GPs' attitudes towards a polypill for the secondary prevention of stroke: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  James Jamison; Jonathan Graffy; Ricky Mullis; Jonathan Mant; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Choosing an epidemiological model structure for the economic evaluation of non-communicable disease public health interventions.

Authors:  Adam D M Briggs; Jane Wolstenholme; Tony Blakely; Peter Scarborough
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Single-pill combinations: a therapeutic option or necessity for vascular risk treatment?

Authors:  Niki Katsiki; Vasilios G Athyros; Asterios Karagiannis
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2013-05-07

7.  Prevention of non-communicable disease: best buys, wasted buys, and contestable buys.

Authors:  Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Yot Teerawattananon; Rachel A Archer; Alia Luz; Manushi Sharma; Waranya Rattanavipapong; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Rachel L Bacon; Tazeem Bhatia; Jesse Bump; Kalipso Chalkidou; Adam G Elshaug; David D Kim; Sumithra Krishnamurthy Reddiar; Ryota Nakamura; Peter J Neumann; Arisa Shichijo; Peter C Smith; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-01-28

8.  The efficacy and tolerability of 'polypills': meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  C Raina Elley; Ajay K Gupta; Ruth Webster; Vanessa Selak; Min Jun; Anushka Patel; Anthony Rodgers; Simon Thom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cost-benefit analysis of the polypill in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wald; Johannes Michiel Luteijn; Joan K Morris; David Taylor; Peter Oppenheimer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 10.  A protocol for an economic evaluation of a polypill in patients with established or at high risk of cardiovascular disease in a UK NHS setting: RUPEE (NHS) study.

Authors:  Catriona Crossan; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Hilarie Williams; Neil Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Stephen Jan; Simon Thom; Joanne Lord
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.