Literature DB >> 20456733

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic equivalence of statins.

T-C Weng1, Y-H Kao Yang, S-J Lin, S-H Tai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statins are the most commonly prescribed agents for hypercholesterolemia because of their efficacy and tolerability. As the number of patients in need of statin therapy continues to increase, information regarding the relative efficacy and safety of statins is required for decision-making.
OBJECTIVE: This study will use systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of different statins at different doses and determine the therapeutically equivalent doses of statins to achieve a specific level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering effect.
METHODS: Publications of head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins were retrieved from the Oregon state database (1966-2004), MEDLINE (2005-April of 2006), EMBASE (2005-April of 2006), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry (up to the first quarter of 2006). The publications were evaluated with predetermined criteria by a reviewer before they were included in the review. The mean change in cholesterol level of each statin was calculated and weighted by number of subjects involved in each RCT. Where possible, meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled estimates of the cholesterol lowering effect of statins and the difference between statins.
RESULTS: Seventy-five studies reporting RCTs of head-to-head comparisons on statins were included. Most studies had similar baseline characteristics, except the rosuvastatin related studies. A daily dose of atorvastatin 10 mg, fluvastatin 80 mg, lovastatin 40-80 mg, and simvastatin 20 mg could decrease LDL-C by 30-40%, and fluvastatin 40 mg, lovastatin 10-20 mg, pravastatin 20-40 mg, and simvastatin 10 mg could decrease LDL-C by 20-30%. The only two statins that could reduce LDL-C more than 40% were rosuvastatin and atorvastatin at a daily dose of 20 mg or higher. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant but clinically minor difference (<7%) between statins in cholesterol lowering effect. Comparisons of coronary heart disease prevention and safety could not be made because of insufficient data.
CONCLUSIONS: At comparable doses, statins are therapeutically equivalent in reducing LDL-C.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456733     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  85 in total

1.  National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Cynthia Vinson; David Chambers; Muin J Khoury; Robert M Kaplan; Christine Hunter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of simvastatin.

Authors:  Carly M Bond; Yi Tang
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 9.783

3.  Systematic literature review of the methodology for developing pharmacotherapeutic interchange guidelines and their implementation in hospitals and ambulatory care settings.

Authors:  Maria Adrover-Rigo; Maria-Dolores Fraga-Fuentes; Francesc Puigventos-Latorre; Iciar Martinez-Lopez
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Clinical importance of the drug interaction between statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study in The Health Improvement Network.

Authors:  Christopher G Rowan; Steven M Brunelli; Jeffrey Munson; James Flory; Peter P Reese; Sean Hennessy; James Lewis; Daniel Mines; Jeffrey S Barrett; Warren Bilker; Brian L Strom
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 5.  Effects of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on small dense low-density lipoprotein: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Masao Niwa; Yusuke Mizuno; Hirotaka Yamamoto; Shin-nosuke Goto; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Potential effects of rational prescribing on national health care spending: More than half a billion dollars in annual savings.

Authors:  Jordan Littman; Roland Halil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  The association between statin medication and progression after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Hamilton; Daniel Morilla; Fernando Cabrera; Michael Leapman; Ling Y Chen; Melanie Bernstein; A Ari Hakimi; Victor E Reuter; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  JAK2-V617F-mediated signalling is dependent on lipid rafts and statins inhibit JAK2-V617F-dependent cell growth.

Authors:  Lori N Griner; Kathy L McGraw; Joseph O Johnson; Alan F List; Gary W Reuther
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 9.  Drug-drug interactions between HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and antiviral protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Benoit Chauvin; Sylvain Drouot; Aurélie Barrail-Tran; Anne-Marie Taburet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Effects of ezetimibe added to statin therapy on markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis and LDL-C lowering in hyperlipidemic patients.

Authors:  Nuntakorn Thongtang; Jianxin Lin; Ernst J Schaefer; Robert S Lowe; Joanne E Tomassini; Arvind K Shah; Andrew M Tershakovec
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.