Literature DB >> 11790072

Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Michael Hayden1, Michael Pignone, Christopher Phillips, Cynthia Mulrow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease events in patients without a history of cardiovascular disease is controversial.
PURPOSE: To examine the benefits and harms of aspirin chemoprevention. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966 to May 2001). STUDY SELECTION: 1) Randomized trials at least 1 year in duration that examined aspirin chemoprevention in patients without previously known cardiovascular disease and 2) systematic reviews, recent trials, and observational studies that examined rates of hemorrhagic strokes and gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to aspirin use. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer read and extracted data from each included article and constructed evidence tables. A second reviewer checked the accuracy of the data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analysis was performed, and the quantitative results of the review were then used to model the consequences of treating patients with different levels of baseline risk for coronary heart disease. Five trials examined the effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events in patients with no previous cardiovascular disease. For patients similar to those enrolled in the trials, aspirin reduces the risk for the combined end point of nonfatal myocardial infarction and fatal coronary heart disease (summary odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87]). Aspirin increased the risk for hemorrhagic strokes (summary odds ratio, 1.4 [CI, 0.9 to 2.0]) and major gastrointestinal bleeding (summary odds ratio, 1.7 [CI, 1.4 to 2.1]). All-cause mortality (summary odds ratio, 0.93 [CI, 0.84 to 1.02]) was not significantly affected. For 1000 patients with a 5% risk for coronary heart disease events over 5 years, aspirin would prevent 6 to 20 myocardial infarctions but would cause 0 to 2 hemorrhagic strokes and 2 to 4 major gastrointestinal bleeding events. For patients with a risk of 1% over 5 years, aspirin would prevent 1 to 4 myocardial infarctions but would cause 0 to 2 hemorrhagic strokes and 2 to 4 major gastrointestinal bleeding events.
CONCLUSIONS: The net benefit of aspirin increases with increasing cardiovascular risk. In the decision to use aspirin chemoprevention, the patient's cardiovascular risk and relative utility for the different clinical outcomes prevented or caused by aspirin use must be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11790072     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  113 in total

1.  Antiplatelet therapy and atherosclerotic events. Commentary is inaccurate.

Authors:  Cathie Sudlow; Peter Sandercock; Charles Warlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

Review 2.  CT screening: a trade-off of risks, benefits, and costs.

Authors:  M G Myriam Hunink; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  The new oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  F W A Verheugt
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  Novel oral anticoagulants to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Freek W A Verheugt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  [Primary prevention of coronary heart disease with aspirin].

Authors:  W Kübler; H Darius
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005

6.  [Possible ways of managing cardiovascular prevention: polypharmacy, additional payment or application of evidence based medicine?].

Authors:  H Gohlke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Aspirin for everyone older than 50? For.

Authors:  Peter Elwood; Gareth Morgan; Ginevra Brown; Janet Pickering
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

8.  Does low-dose ASA help prevent cardiovascular events in women?

Authors:  Abdullah Alkhenizan; W Farooq
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.

Authors:  Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Approach to managing musculoskeletal pain: acetaminophen, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or traditional NSAIDs?

Authors:  Richard H Hunt; Denis Choquette; Brian N Craig; Carlo De Angelis; Flavio Habal; Gordon Fulthorpe; John I Stewart; Alexander G G Turpie; Paul Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.