Literature DB >> 12829553

A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%.

N J Wald1, M R Law.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the combination of drugs and vitamins, and their doses, for use in a single daily pill to achieve a large effect in preventing cardiovascular disease with minimal adverse effects. The strategy was to simultaneously reduce four cardiovascular risk factors (low density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, serum homocysteine, and platelet function) regardless of pretreatment levels.
DESIGN: We quantified the efficacy and adverse effects of the proposed formulation from published meta-analyses of randomised trials and cohort studies and a meta-analysis of 15 trials of low dose (50-125 mg/day) aspirin. OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportional reduction in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) events and strokes; life years gained; and prevalence of adverse effects.
RESULTS: The formulation which met our objectives was: a statin (for example, atorvastatin (daily dose 10 mg) or simvastatin (40 mg)); three blood pressure lowering drugs (for example, a thiazide, a beta blocker, and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor), each at half standard dose; folic acid (0.8 mg); and aspirin (75 mg). We estimate that the combination (which we call the Polypill) reduces IHD events by 88% (95% confidence interval 84% to 91%) and stroke by 80% (71% to 87%). One third of people taking this pill from age 55 would benefit, gaining on average about 11 years of life free from an IHD event or stroke. Summing the adverse effects of the components observed in randomised trials shows that the Polypill would cause symptoms in 8-15% of people (depending on the precise formulation).
CONCLUSION: The Polypill strategy could largely prevent heart attacks and stroke if taken by everyone aged 55 and older and everyone with existing cardiovascular disease. It would be acceptably safe and with widespread use would have a greater impact on the prevention of disease in the Western world than any other single intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12829553      PMCID: PMC162259          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  21 in total

Review 1.  When can a risk factor be used as a worthwhile screening test?

Authors:  N J Wald; A K Hackshaw; C D Frost
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

Review 2.  Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

3.  Decreased rate of coronary restenosis after lowering of plasma homocysteine levels.

Authors:  G Schnyder; M Roffi; R Pin; Y Flammer; H Lange; F R Eberli; B Meier; Z G Turi; O M Hess
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Randomized trial of folic acid supplementation and serum homocysteine levels.

Authors:  D S Wald; L Bishop; N J Wald; M Law; E Hennessy; D Weir; J McPartlin; J Scott
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-03-12

5.  The underlying risk of death after myocardial infarction in the absence of treatment.

Authors:  Malcolm R Law; Hilary C Watt; Nicholas J Wald
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

6.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

7.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.

Authors:  F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Post-stroke antihypertensive treatment study. A preliminary result.

Authors: 
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-06       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  350 in total

1.  Quantifying links between stroke and risk factors: a study on individual health risk appraisal of stroke in a community of Chongqing.

Authors:  Yazhou Wu; Ling Zhang; Xiaoyan Yuan; Yamin Wu; Dong Yi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: birthday present was much appreciated.

Authors:  Felipe Ramos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

3.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: cost effectiveness of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular events is questionable.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Benedetta Santarlasci; Sabrina Trippoli; Monica Vaiani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

4.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: interpretation of trial data is optimistic.

Authors:  Gerd Assmann; Paul Cullen; Helmut Schulte
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

5.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: old joke has element of truth.

Authors:  Adrian K Midgley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

6.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: patients before populations.

Authors:  Peter Trewby; Catherine Trewby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

7.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: universal polypharmacy goes against recent beliefs in prescribing practice.

Authors:  Mark Powlson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

8.  "Polypill" to fight cardiovascular disease: now who's playing God?

Authors:  Steve Taylor; Angela Konings
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

9.  In defence of polypharmacy.

Authors:  J K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Polypill debate continues: people will always be sceptical.

Authors:  Hans P Colvin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.