Literature DB >> 22184286

Chromosomal instability substantiates poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Samuel F Bakhoum1, Olga V Danilova, Prabhjot Kaur, Norman B Levy, Duane A Compton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The specific role of chromosomal instability (CIN) in tumorigenesis has been a matter of conjecture. In part, this is due to the challenge of directly observing chromosome mis-segregation events as well as the inability to distinguish the role of CIN, which consists of increased rates of chromosome mis-segregation, from that of aneuploidy, which is a state of nondiploid chromosome number. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Here, we examine the contribution of CIN to the prognosis of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by directly surveying tumor cells, fixed while undergoing anaphase, for evidence of chromosome mis-segregation. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained samples from a cohort of 54 patients were used to examine the relationship between frequencies of chromosome mis-segregation and patient prognosis, overall survival, and response to treatment.
RESULTS: We show that a two-fold increase in the frequency of chromosome mis-segregation led to a 24% decrease in overall survival and 48% decrease in relapse-free survival after treatment. The HR of death in patients with increased chromosome mis-segregation was 2.31 and these patients were more likely to present with higher tumor stage, exhibit tumor bone marrow involvement, and receive a higher International Prognostic Index score.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of chromosome mis-segregation in DLBCL substantiate inferior outcome and poor prognosis. This is likely due to increased heterogeneity of tumor cells leading to a larger predilection for adaptation in response to external pressures such as metastasis and drug treatments. We propose that targeting CIN would yield superior prognosis and improved response to chemotherapeutic drugs. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184286      PMCID: PMC3244806          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  48 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of AZD1152, an i.v. inhibitor of Aurora B kinase, in patients with solid malignant tumors.

Authors:  D S Boss; P O Witteveen; J van der Sar; M P Lolkema; E E Voest; P K Stockman; O Ataman; D Wilson; S Das; J H Schellens
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  CLASP1, astrin and Kif2b form a molecular switch that regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics to promote mitotic progression and fidelity.

Authors:  Amity L Manning; Samuel F Bakhoum; Stefano Maffini; Clara Correia-Melo; Helder Maiato; Duane A Compton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Mad2 is a critical mediator of the chromosome instability observed upon Rb and p53 pathway inhibition.

Authors:  Juan-Manuel Schvartzman; Pascal H G Duijf; Rocio Sotillo; Courtney Coker; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Different outcomes of telomere-dependent anaphase bridges.

Authors:  Laura Tusell; Judit Pampalona; David Soler; Cristina Frías; Anna Genescà
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 5.  High risk of malignancy in mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome.

Authors:  Sébastien Jacquemont; Michelle Bocéno; Jean Marie Rival; Françoise Méchinaud; Albert David
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-04-15

6.  Patterns and incidence of chromosomal instability and their prognostic relevance in breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Marcel Smid; Marlous Hoes; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Stefan Sleijfer; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; John A Foekens; John W M Martens
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Paradoxical relationship between chromosomal instability and survival outcome in cancer.

Authors:  Nicolai J Birkbak; Aron C Eklund; Qiyuan Li; Sarah E McClelland; David Endesfelder; Patrick Tan; Iain B Tan; Andrea L Richardson; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  [Chromosomal abnormalities in acute myeloid leukaemias].

Authors:  F Mugneret; P Callier; B Favre-Audry
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2003-08

9.  Centrosome aberrations as a possible mechanism for chromosomal instability in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  A Krämer; S Schweizer; K Neben; C Giesecke; J Kalla; T Katzenberger; A Benner; H K Müller-Hermelink; A D Ho; G Ott
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells.

Authors:  D Cimini; B Howell; P Maddox; A Khodjakov; F Degrassi; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  49 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability upregulates interferon in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ning Jin; Robert F Lera; Rachel E Yan; Fen Guo; Kim Oxendine; Vanessa L Horner; Yang Hu; Jun Wan; Ryan J Mattison; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; David Endesfelder; Marco R Novelli; Charles Swanton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Chromosome Mis-segregation Generates Cell-Cycle-Arrested Cells with Complex Karyotypes that Are Eliminated by the Immune System.

Authors:  Stefano Santaguida; Amelia Richardson; Divya Ramalingam Iyer; Ons M'Saad; Lauren Zasadil; Kristin A Knouse; Yao Liang Wong; Nicholas Rhind; Arshad Desai; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  Mitosis as an anti-cancer drug target.

Authors:  Anna-Leena Salmela; Marko J Kallio
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Chromosomal instability suppresses the growth of K-Ras-induced lung adenomas.

Authors:  Christopher D Laucius; Bernardo Orr; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  The Multifaceted Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Its Microenvironment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Genome Stability Requires p53.

Authors:  Christine M Eischen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Adaptive Resistance to an Inhibitor of Chromosomal Instability in Human Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Bernardo Orr; Lama Talje; Zhexian Liu; Benjamin H Kwok; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis.

Authors:  Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  High level of chromosomal aberration in ovarian cancer genome correlates with poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Leslie Cope; Ren-Chin Wu; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.