Literature DB >> 20632083

Patterns and incidence of chromosomal instability and their prognostic relevance in breast cancer subtypes.

Marcel Smid1, Marlous Hoes, Anieta M Sieuwerts, Stefan Sleijfer, Yi Zhang, Yixin Wang, John A Foekens, John W M Martens.   

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of human solid tumors is chromosomal instability (CIN). We studied global patterns as well as individual levels of CIN and determined the prognostic relevance among breast cancer subtypes. For this, we used single nucleotide polymorphism copy number data of 313 primary lymph-node negative breast cancers. The level of CIN for individual samples was determined by counting the total number of chromosomal segments showing a gain or loss per specimen. Hierarchical clustering resulted in four groups showing distinct patterns of abnormalities, predominantly characterized by 1q gain, 8q gain, 1q&8q gain, or no gain of these loci. Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative samples showed an uneven distribution (statistically significant) across the cluster-groups, as did the molecular subtypes and triple-negative tumors (negative for estrogen-, progesterone-, and her2/neu-receptor). The CIN-score was significantly higher in ER-negative and triple-negative samples. Among luminal cancers, luminal B had a higher CIN-score than luminal A. The CIN-score was significantly associated with prognosis, measured by the time to distant metastasis, in ER-positive, luminal B, and her2/neu subtypes, but not in ER-negative patients. Our study points to a multifaceted role for CIN in breast cancer. Within ER-negative samples, CIN is likely related to the onset but other factors govern the progression of the disease. In contrast, CIN is clearly associated with progression in ER-positive, luminal B, and her2/neu subtypes; thus, assessing CIN in these subtypes may contribute to personalized patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632083     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1026-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  44 in total

1.  Spontaneous transformation of murine epithelial cells requires the early acquisition of specific chromosomal aneuploidies and genomic imbalances.

Authors:  Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Karen Hathcock; Nicole E McNeil; David Mack; Daniel Hoeppner; Rea Ravin; Turid Knutsen; Raluca Yonescu; Danny Wangsa; Kathleen Dorritie; Linda Barenboim; Yue Hu; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; David Endesfelder; Marco R Novelli; Charles Swanton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Body mass index is associated with gene methylation in estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors.

Authors:  Brionna Y Hair; Melissa A Troester; Sharon N Edmiston; Eloise A Parrish; Whitney R Robinson; Michael C Wu; Andrew F Olshan; Theresa Swift-Scanlan; Kathleen Conway
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Amplification of TLK2 Induces Genomic Instability via Impairing the G2-M Checkpoint.

Authors:  Jin-Ah Kim; Meenakshi Anurag; Jamunarani Veeraraghavan; Rachel Schiff; Kaiyi Li; Xiao-Song Wang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Genome Stability Requires p53.

Authors:  Christine M Eischen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Chromosomal instability substantiates poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Olga V Danilova; Prabhjot Kaur; Norman B Levy; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Genomic instability in breast and ovarian cancers: translation into clinical predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Marieke A Vollebergh; Jos Jonkers; Sabine C Linn
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Eya3 promotes breast tumor-associated immune suppression via threonine phosphatase-mediated PD-L1 upregulation.

Authors:  Rebecca L Vartuli; Hengbo Zhou; Lingdi Zhang; Rani K Powers; Jared Klarquist; Pratyaydipta Rudra; Melanie Y Vincent; Debashis Ghosh; James C Costello; Ross M Kedl; Jill E Slansky; Rui Zhao; Heide L Ford
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  CKS1BP7, a Pseudogene of CKS1B, is Co-Amplified with IGF1R in Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Yansong Liu; Wei Wang; Yan Li; Feifei Sun; Jiaxiang Lin; Li Li
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Adverse prognostic impact of intratumor heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Qian Shi; William R Sukov; Mark A Lewis; Christopher A Sattler; Anne E Wiktor; Tsung-Teh Wu; Robert B Diasio; Robert B Jenkins; Frank A Sinicrope
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.