Literature DB >> 22184222

Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells.

Teresa Neumaier1, Joel Swenson, Christopher Pham, Aris Polyzos, Alvin T Lo, PoAn Yang, Jane Dyball, Aroumougame Asaithamby, David J Chen, Mina J Bissell, Stefan Thalhammer, Sylvain V Costes.   

Abstract

The concept of DNA "repair centers" and the meaning of radiation-induced foci (RIF) in human cells have remained controversial. RIFs are characterized by the local recruitment of DNA damage sensing proteins such as p53 binding protein (53BP1). Here, we provide strong evidence for the existence of repair centers. We used live imaging and mathematical fitting of RIF kinetics to show that RIF induction rate increases with increasing radiation dose, whereas the rate at which RIFs disappear decreases. We show that multiple DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) 1 to 2 μm apart can rapidly cluster into repair centers. Correcting mathematically for the dose dependence of induction/resolution rates, we observe an absolute RIF yield that is surprisingly much smaller at higher doses: 15 RIF/Gy after 2 Gy exposure compared to approximately 64 RIF/Gy after 0.1 Gy. Cumulative RIF counts from time lapse of 53BP1-GFP in human breast cells confirmed these results. The standard model currently in use applies a linear scale, extrapolating cancer risk from high doses to low doses of ionizing radiation. However, our discovery of DSB clustering over such large distances casts considerable doubts on the general assumption that risk to ionizing radiation is proportional to dose, and instead provides a mechanism that could more accurately address risk dose dependency of ionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184222      PMCID: PMC3258602          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117849108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Locations of radiation-produced DNA double strand breaks along chromosomes: a stochastic cluster process formalism.

Authors:  R K Sachs; A L Ponomarev; P Hahnfeldt; L R Hlatky
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase ATM.

Authors:  Ian Hickson; Yan Zhao; Caroline J Richardson; Sharon J Green; Niall M B Martin; Alisdair I Orr; Philip M Reaper; Stephen P Jackson; Nicola J Curtin; Graeme C M Smith
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Computational Methods for analysis of foci: validation for radiation-induced gamma-H2AX foci in human cells.

Authors:  Wilfried Böcker; George Iliakis
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events.

Authors:  H Nikjoo; P O'Neill; D T Goodhead; M Terrissol
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 5.  Insight into sites.

Authors:  J R Savage
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Review: proximity effects in the production of chromosome aberrations by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  R K Sachs; A M Chen; D J Brenner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Track structure analysis of ultrasoft X-rays compared to high- and low-LET radiations.

Authors:  D T Goodhead; H Nikjoo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; D R Pilch; A H Orr; V S Ivanova; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Radial cutoff LET and radial cutoff dose calculations for heavy charged particles in water.

Authors:  A Chatterjee; H D Maccabee; C A Tobias
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

View more
  99 in total

1.  Double-strand break motions shift radiation risk notions?

Authors:  Lynn Hlatky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Direct measurement of the 3-dimensional DNA lesion distribution induced by energetic charged particles in a mouse model tissue.

Authors:  Johanna Mirsch; Francesco Tommasino; Antonia Frohns; Sandro Conrad; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz; Thomas Friedrich; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nuclear safety in the unexpected second nuclear era.

Authors:  Yican Wu; Zhibin Chen; Zhen Wang; Shanqi Chen; Daochuan Ge; Chao Chen; Jiangtao Jia; Yazhou Li; Ming Jin; Tao Zhou; Fang Wang; Liqin Hu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  LNT RIP: It is time to bury the linear no threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Rittu Hingorani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Frequency of DNA end joining in trans is not determined by the predamage spatial proximity of double-strand breaks in yeast.

Authors:  Sham Sunder; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The new radiobiology: returning to our roots.

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  The BIANCA model/code of radiation-induced cell death: application to human cells exposed to different radiation types.

Authors:  Francesca Ballarini; Saverio Altieri; Silva Bortolussi; Mario Carante; Elio Giroletti; Nicoletta Protti
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

9.  Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors).

Authors:  Bill Sacks; Gregory Meyerson; Jeffry A Siegel
Journal:  Biol Theory       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 10.  Nuclear actin filaments in DNA repair dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Caridi; Matthias Plessner; Robert Grosse; Irene Chiolo
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.