Literature DB >> 31427507

Nuclear safety in the unexpected second nuclear era.

Yican Wu1, Zhibin Chen2, Zhen Wang2, Shanqi Chen2, Daochuan Ge2, Chao Chen2, Jiangtao Jia2, Yazhou Li2, Ming Jin2, Tao Zhou2, Fang Wang2, Liqin Hu2.   

Abstract

Nuclear energy development has entered an unexpected second nuclear era, which is mainly driven by developing countries. Despite major efforts to pursue a safe nuclear energy system in the first nuclear era, severe nuclear accidents occurred. A basic problem is that we do not have an adequate understanding of nuclear safety. From the viewpoints of risk and the close coupling of technical and social factors, this paper reexamines the nature of nuclear safety and reviews how previous experts understood it. We also highlight the new challenges that we are likely to confront in the unexpected second nuclear era and clarify some of the refinements that need to be made to the concept of nuclear safety from a sociotechnical perspective. These include the following: 1) Risk decisions should be made based on integrating social and technical elements (i.e., "social rationality"); 2) risk needs to be controlled based on the "Wuli-Shili-Renli" framework; 3) systems thinking should be substituted for reductionism in risk assessment, and social mechanisms need to be combined to address uncertainties; and 4) public-centered risk communication should be established. This contribution can provide a theoretical foundation for improving our understanding of the nature of nuclear safety and for transforming the concept of nuclear safety in the unexpected second nuclear era.

Keywords:  nuclear safety; risk; sociotechnical perspective; unexpected second nuclear era

Year:  2019        PMID: 31427507      PMCID: PMC6731636          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820007116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  How useful is quantitative risk assessment?

Authors:  George E Apostolakis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells.

Authors:  Teresa Neumaier; Joel Swenson; Christopher Pham; Aris Polyzos; Alvin T Lo; PoAn Yang; Jane Dyball; Aroumougame Asaithamby; David J Chen; Mina J Bissell; Stefan Thalhammer; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Geochemistry. Tracking the Fukushima radionuclides.

Authors:  Naohiro Yoshida; Jota Kanda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  ISO 31000:2009--Setting a new standard for risk management.

Authors:  Grant Purdy
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Technologies of humility.

Authors:  Sheila Jasanoff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: the case of offshore platforms.

Authors:  M E Paté-Cornell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Inherently safe reactors and a second nuclear era.

Authors:  A M Weinberg; I Spiewak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Nuclear safety. Preventing the next Fukushima.

Authors:  Matthew Bunn; Olli Heinonen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Fukushima revives the low-dose debate.

Authors:  Dennis Normile
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cancer in populations living near nuclear facilities. A survey of mortality nationwide and incidence in two states.

Authors:  S Jablon; Z Hrubec; J D Boice
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.