Literature DB >> 22178288

X-ray induced DNA double-strand breaks in coronary CT angiography: comparison of sequential, low-pitch helical and high-pitch helical data acquisition.

Michael Brand1, Matthias Sommer, Stephan Achenbach, Katharina Anders, Michael Lell, Markus Löbrich, Michael Uder, Michael A Kuefner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to compare DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing high-pitch helical, low-pitch helical and sequential coronary CT angiography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 66 patients were examined with various scan protocols and modes (low-pitch helical scan: 100-120 kV, 320-438 mAs/rot, pitch 0.18-0.39, with or without ECG-pulsing, n=35; prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch helical scan: 100-120 kV, 320-456 mAs/rotation, pitch 3.2-3.4, n=19; prospectively ECG-triggered sequential scan: 100-120 kV, 150-300 mAs or 320-370 mAs/rotation, n=12) either using a 64-slice or 128-slice dual-source CT or a 128-slice single source CT scanner. Blood samples were obtained before and 30 min after CT and DSBs were analyzed in isolated lymphocytes using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy. A significant increase of DSBs was measurable 30 min after CTA (range 0.01-0.71/cell). CT induced DSBs showed a significant correlation with the estimated effective dose (ρ=0.90, p<0.00001). Both prospectively ECG-triggered sequential (0.10 DSBs/cell, 176 mGy cm, p<0.00001) and high-pitch helical scan protocols (0.03 DSBs/cell, 109 mGy cm, p<0.00001) led to a significant reduction of median DLP and DSB levels compared to low-pitch helical scans (0.34 DSBs/cell, 828 mGy cm). A reduction of the tube voltage resulted in significantly lower whereas additional calcium scoring resulted in elevated DLP and DNA damages (p<0.05 each).
CONCLUSION: In coronary CTA, data acquisition protocols have a significant influence on the X-ray induced DSB levels. Using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy different scan modes in different CT generations can be compared concerning their biological impact.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178288     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  21 in total

1.  Reaching for better image quality and lower radiation dose in head and neck CT: advanced modeled and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction in combination with tube voltage adaptation.

Authors:  Andrea I Schmid; Michael Uder; Michael M Lell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effects of Breast Shielding during Heart Imaging on DNA Double-Strand-Break Levels: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michael K Cheezum; Christophe E Redon; Allison S Burrell; Anthony S Kaviratne; Jody Bindeman; Daisuke Maeda; Houria Balmakhtar; Ashly Pezel; Piotr Wisniewski; Panfilo Delacruz; Binh Nguyen; William M Bonner; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Patricia K Nguyen; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Absence of DNA double-strand breaks in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging assessed by γH2AX flow cytometry.

Authors:  Martin Fasshauer; Thomas Krüwel; Antonia Zapf; Vera C Stahnke; Margret Rave-Fränk; Wieland Staab; Jan M Sohns; Michael Steinmetz; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Andreas Schuster; Christian Ritter; Joachim Lotz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Significant Suppression of CT Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Normal Human Cells by the PrC-210 Radioprotector.

Authors:  Frank Jermusek; Chelsea Benedict; Emma Dreischmeier; Michael Brand; Michael Uder; Justin J Jeffery; Frank N Ranallo; William E Fahl
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Chest circumference as a predictive parameter of computed tomography coronary angiography radiation doses from dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  M Erdem Sagsoz; Ummugulsum Bayraktutan; Hayri Ogul; Mecit Kantarci
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2013-02

7.  Assessment of the Radiation Effects of Cardiac CT Angiography Using Protein and Genetic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Patricia K Nguyen; Won Hee Lee; Yong Fuga Li; Wan Xing Hong; Shijun Hu; Charles Chan; Grace Liang; Ivy Nguyen; Sang-Ging Ong; Jared Churko; Jia Wang; Russ B Altman; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22

8.  DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes induced by two-day 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Lisa Hartmann; Dominik Geisel; Felicitas Richter; Winfried Brenner; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  From 'Image Gently' to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk.

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

10.  X-ray induced formation of γ-H2AX foci after full-field digital mammography and digital breast-tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Siegfried A Schwab; Michael Brand; Ina-Kristin Schlude; Wolfgang Wuest; Martina Meier-Meitinger; Luitpold Distel; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Michael Uder; Michael A Kuefner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.