Literature DB >> 26210695

Assessment of the Radiation Effects of Cardiac CT Angiography Using Protein and Genetic Biomarkers.

Patricia K Nguyen1, Won Hee Lee2, Yong Fuga Li3, Wan Xing Hong2, Shijun Hu2, Charles Chan4, Grace Liang5, Ivy Nguyen5, Sang-Ging Ong2, Jared Churko2, Jia Wang6, Russ B Altman3, Dominik Fleischmann7, Joseph C Wu8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether radiation exposure from cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is associated with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage and whether damage leads to programmed cell death and activation of genes involved in apoptosis and DNA repair.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to radiation from medical imaging has become a public health concern, but whether it causes significant cell damage remains unclear.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 67 patients undergoing cardiac CTA between January 2012 and December 2013 in 2 U.S. medical centers. Median blood radiation exposure was estimated using phantom dosimetry. Biomarkers of DNA damage and apoptosis were measured by flow cytometry, whole genome sequencing, and single cell polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: The median dose length product was 1,535.3 mGy·cm (969.7 to 2,674.0 mGy·cm). The median radiation dose to the blood was 29.8 mSv (18.8 to 48.8 mSv). Median DNA damage increased 3.39% (1.29% to 8.04%, p < 0.0001) and median apoptosis increased 3.1-fold (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.4- to 5.1-fold, p < 0.0001) post-radiation. Whole genome sequencing revealed changes in the expression of 39 transcription factors involved in the regulation of apoptosis, cell cycle, and DNA repair. Genes involved in mediating apoptosis and DNA repair were significantly changed post-radiation, including DDB2 (1.9-fold [IQR: 1.5- to 3.0-fold], p < 0.001), XRCC4 (3.0-fold [IQR: 1.1- to 5.4-fold], p = 0.005), and BAX (1.6-fold [IQR: 0.9- to 2.6-fold], p < 0.001). Exposure to radiation was associated with DNA damage (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8 [1.2 to 2.6], p = 0.003). DNA damage was associated with apoptosis (OR: 1.9 [1.2 to 5.1], p < 0.0001) and gene activation (OR: 2.8 [1.2 to 6.2], p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients exposed to >7.5 mSv of radiation from cardiac CTA had evidence of DNA damage, which was associated with programmed cell death and activation of genes involved in apoptosis and DNA repair.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT/MRI; gene expression; gene regulation; imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26210695      PMCID: PMC5019957          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  38 in total

1.  How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Effect of CT scan protocols on x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  M A Kuefner; S Grudzenski; J Hamann; S Achenbach; Michael Lell; K Anders; S A Schwab; L Häberle; M Löbrich; M Uder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Carl D Elliston; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen; Richard Mather; Gregory D N Pearson; Robert L Delapaz; Edward Nickoloff; Ajoy Dutta; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Achieving quality in cardiovascular imaging: proceedings from the American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Pamela Douglas; Ami E Iskandrian; Harlan M Krumholz; Linda Gillam; Robert Hendel; James Jollis; Eric Peterson; Jersey Chen; Frederick Masoudi; Emile Mohler; Robert L McNamara; Manesh R Patel; John Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Dissecting p53-dependent apoptosis.

Authors:  J E Chipuk; D R Green
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  Multiple mechanisms contribute to inhibit transcription in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  George F Heine; Andrew A Horwitz; Jeffrey D Parvin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  DNA-dependent protein kinase and XRCC4-DNA ligase IV mobilization in the cell in response to DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Jérôme Drouet; Christine Delteil; Jacques Lefrançois; Patrick Concannon; Bernard Salles; Patrick Calsou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-31       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  30 in total

1.  Cardiac CTA for evaluation of cardiac function in patients with congenital heart disease: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Authors:  S Bruce Greenberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Cardiac MR Imaging and the Specter of Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Ruth A Kleinerman; Dorothea McAreavey; Preetha Rajaraman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  LNT RIP: It is time to bury the linear no threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Rittu Hingorani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  High-pitch CT, decreasing need for sedation and its potential side effects: some practical considerations and future directions.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-12-10

5.  Cardiovascular PET/MR: "Not the end but the beginning".

Authors:  Thomas Hellmut Schindler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The associated factors for radiation dose variation in cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Ali B Alhailiy; Ernest U Ekpo; Peter L Kench; Elaine A Ryan; Patrick C Brennan; Mark McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Striking a balance in the discussion of the benefits of imaging tests and risks of radiation exposure.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson; Prem Soman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Biologic effects of radiation from cardiac imaging: New insights from proteomic and genomic analyses.

Authors:  Prem Soman; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Patricia K Nguyen; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Dose reduction technique in diagnostic X-ray computed tomography by use of 6-channel multileaf collimators.

Authors:  Fumio Hashimoto; Atsushi Teramoto; Yasuki Asada; Shoichi Suzuki; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.