OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elective single embryo transfer (eSET) lowers the risk of poor perinatal outcomes associated with IVF, when [1] compared with double embryo transfer (DET) or multiple embryo transfer (MET), and separately, [2] compared with spontaneous conceptions. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Centers for reproductive care. PATIENT(S): Infertility patients. INTERVENTION(S): MEDLINE, Embase, and bibliographies were searched for the period 1978-2011. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Dichotomous data were pooled using relative risks and continuous data with mean differences using a random effects model. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and cohort studies that examined any of the primary or secondary outcomes in singleton, twin, or multiple-order infants conceived by eSET as compared with [1] those conceived by DET or MET or [2] spontaneously conceived singleton gestations were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks' gestation) and low birth weight (LBW, <2,500 g). RESULT(S): Sixteen studies were included (eight RCTs, eight cohort studies). Compared with DET-conceived infants, eSET-conceived singletons were less likely to be born either preterm (RCT-based relative risk [RR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.55) or with LBW (RCT-based RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15-0.45; cohort study RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91). However, compared with spontaneously conceived singletons, eSET gestations had higher risks of PTB (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.26-3.61), placenta previa (RR 6.02, 95% CI 2.79-13.01), gestational diabetes (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.42), and ectopic pregnancy (RR 6.40, 95% CI 4.38-9.35). CONCLUSION(S): Elective single embryo transfer is associated with decreased risks of PTB and LBW compared with DET but higher risks of PTB compared with spontaneously conceived singletons.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elective single embryo transfer (eSET) lowers the risk of poor perinatal outcomes associated with IVF, when [1] compared with double embryo transfer (DET) or multiple embryo transfer (MET), and separately, [2] compared with spontaneous conceptions. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Centers for reproductive care. PATIENT(S): Infertility patients. INTERVENTION(S): MEDLINE, Embase, and bibliographies were searched for the period 1978-2011. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Dichotomous data were pooled using relative risks and continuous data with mean differences using a random effects model. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and cohort studies that examined any of the primary or secondary outcomes in singleton, twin, or multiple-order infants conceived by eSET as compared with [1] those conceived by DET or MET or [2] spontaneously conceived singleton gestations were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks' gestation) and low birth weight (LBW, <2,500 g). RESULT(S): Sixteen studies were included (eight RCTs, eight cohort studies). Compared with DET-conceived infants, eSET-conceived singletons were less likely to be born either preterm (RCT-based relative risk [RR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.55) or with LBW (RCT-based RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15-0.45; cohort study RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91). However, compared with spontaneously conceived singletons, eSET gestations had higher risks of PTB (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.26-3.61), placenta previa (RR 6.02, 95% CI 2.79-13.01), gestational diabetes (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.42), and ectopic pregnancy (RR 6.40, 95% CI 4.38-9.35). CONCLUSION(S): Elective single embryo transfer is associated with decreased risks of PTB and LBW compared with DET but higher risks of PTB compared with spontaneously conceived singletons.
Authors: Adam J Fechner; Kelecia R Brown; Ndidiamaka Onwubalili; Sangita K Jindal; Gerson Weiss; Laura T Goldsmith; Peter G McGovern Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 8.661