Literature DB >> 25254166

Neonatal risks from in vitro fertilization and delayed motherhood.

Carlo Valerio Bellieni1.   

Abstract

Delayed childbearing (DC) is common in most Western countries. The average age of first-time mothers increased in United States from 21.4 years in 1970 to 25.0 years in 2006 and from 25.4 to 30.8 years in Australia in the same period. It is commonly believed that this has no ominous consequences. But several negative consequences of this behavior are described: stillbirth, prematurity, twins, birth anomalies. Age also decreases women's fertility, thus many couples undergo in vitro fertilization. And we highlight a paradox: medical reproduction techniques decreases their effectiveness with maternal age, but their availability can be an incentive to postpone parenthood. Of course the risks of delayed parenthood involve a minority of cases, but are parents entitled to accept any risk on the behalf of their baby A complete information would make people cautious before deciding to postpone childbearing, though this is often an obliged rather that a free choice: the consumerist society pressure and the difficulty to find an employment have their heavy weight in this choice. But if this choice is not really free, people's interest is to overcome these pressures and to claim for a real broad choice on when becoming parent, despite the pressures made by their cultural environment to postpone parenthood. Moreover, even reproductive techniques have some risks. Unfortunately, mass media often praise and endorse DC, disregarding the increase of premature babies born because of DC, a real alarm for public health. Pediatricians should discourage the culture that makes DC a normal event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Babies; In vitro fertilization; Motherhood

Year:  2012        PMID: 25254166      PMCID: PMC4145649          DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v1.i4.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr        ISSN: 2219-2808


  25 in total

1.  [The role of infertility treatment in very premature births in France. The point of view of the neonatologist].

Authors:  M Dehan
Journal:  Contracept Fertil Sex       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Balasch; Eduard Gratacós
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 3.  Reproductive 'choice' and egg freezing.

Authors:  Angel Petropanagos
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

4.  The epigenetic imprinting defect of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome born after assisted reproductive technology is not restricted to the 11p15 region.

Authors:  S Rossignol; V Steunou; C Chalas; A Kerjean; M Rigolet; E Viegas-Pequignot; P Jouannet; Y Le Bouc; C Gicquel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 5.  Assisted reproductive technologies and birth defects.

Authors:  Kohei Shiota; Shigehito Yamada
Journal:  Congenit Anom (Kyoto)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.409

6.  Factors influencing women's decisions about timing of motherhood.

Authors:  Karen Benzies; Suzanne Tough; Karen Tofflemire; Corine Frick; Alexandra Faber; Christine Newburn-Cook
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

7.  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.

Authors:  A Nyboe Andersen; V Goossens; A P Ferraretti; S Bhattacharya; R Felberbaum; J de Mouzon; K G Nygren
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Analysis of 2,386 consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above.

Authors:  Gamal Serour; Ragaa Mansour; Ahmed Serour; Mona Aboulghar; Yahia Amin; Omnia Kamal; Hesham Al-Inany; Mohamed Aboulghar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life.

Authors:  T J Matthews; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2009-08

Review 10.  Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Roger Gosden; Jacquetta Trasler; Diana Lucifero; Malcolm Faddy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial replacement therapy in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Don P Wolf; Nargiz Mitalipov; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 11.951

2.  Functional Human Oocytes Generated by Transfer of Polar Body Genomes.

Authors:  Hong Ma; Ryan C O'Neil; Nuria Marti Gutierrez; Manoj Hariharan; Zhuzhu Z Zhang; Yupeng He; Cengiz Cinnioglu; Refik Kayali; Eunju Kang; Yeonmi Lee; Tomonari Hayama; Amy Koski; Joseph Nery; Rosa Castanon; Rebecca Tippner-Hedges; Riffat Ahmed; Crystal Van Dyken; Ying Li; Susan Olson; David Battaglia; David M Lee; Diana H Wu; Paula Amato; Don P Wolf; Joseph R Ecker; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  The Best Age for Pregnancy and Undue Pressures.

Authors:  Carlo Bellieni
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2016-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.