Literature DB >> 22173943

Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP).

Reinhard C Huber1, Liliana Remuge, Ailsa Carlisle, Simon Lillico, Peter Sandøe, Dorte B Sørensen, C Bruce A Whitelaw, I Anna S Olsson.   

Abstract

Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology--animal welfare--has not been approached through systematic assessment and statements regarding the welfare of transgenic pigs have been based on anecdotal observations during early stages of transgenic programs. The main aim of the present study was therefore to perform an extensive welfare assessment comparing heterozygous transgenic animals expressing GFP with wildtype animals along various stages of post natal development. The protocol used covered reproductory performance and behaviour in GFP and wildtype sows and general health and development, social behaviour, exploratory behaviour and emotionality in GFP and wildtype littermates from birth until an age of roughly 4 months. The absence of significant differences between GFP and wildtype animals in the parameters observed suggests that the transgenic animals in question are unlikely to suffer from deleterious effects of transgene expression on their welfare and thus support existing anecdotal observations of pigs expressing GFP as healthy. Although the results are not surprising in the light of previous experience, they give a more solid fundament to the evaluation of GFP expression as being relatively non-invasive in pigs. The present study may furthermore serve as starting point for researchers aiming at a systematic characterization of welfare relevant effects in the line of transgenic pigs they are working with.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173943     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  25 in total

1.  Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors.

Authors:  Andreas Hofmann; Barbara Kessler; Sonja Ewerling; Myriam Weppert; Barbara Vogg; Harald Ludwig; Miodrag Stojkovic; Marc Boelhauve; Gottfried Brem; Eckhard Wolf; Alexander Pfeifer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Behavioral and functional analysis of mouse phenotype: SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment.

Authors:  D C Rogers; E M Fisher; S D Brown; J Peters; A J Hunter; J E Martin
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Science-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals.

Authors:  I J H Duncan
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.181

Review 4.  Assessing ethics and animal welfare in animal biotechnology for farm production.

Authors:  M Kaiser
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.181

Review 5.  Enhancing livestock through genetic engineering--recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  G Laible
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.268

6.  Multi-transgenic pigs expressing three fluorescent proteins produced with high efficiency by sperm mediated gene transfer.

Authors:  Nicole L Webster; Monica Forni; Maria Laura Bacci; Roberto Giovannoni; Riccardo Razzini; Paolo Fantinati; Augusta Zannoni; Lisa Fusetti; Leda Dalprà; Maria Rosaria Bianco; Michele Papa; Eraldo Seren; Mauro S Sandrin; Ian F C Mc Kenzie; Marialuisa Lavitrano
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Preweaning housing effects on behavior and physiological measures in pigs during the suckling and fattening periods.

Authors:  H Chaloupková; G Illmann; K Neuhauserová; M Tománek; L Valis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Production of transgenic-clone pigs by the combination of ICSI-mediated gene transfer with somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Mayuko Kurome; Hideto Ueda; Ryo Tomii; Katsutoshi Naruse; Hiroshi Nagashima
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 9.  Production of a reporter transgenic pig for monitoring Cre recombinase activity.

Authors:  Li Li; Daxin Pang; Tiedong Wang; Zhanjun Li; Limei Chen; Mingjun Zhang; Na Song; Daibang Nie; Zhenwen Chen; Liangxue Lai; Hongsheng Ouyang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Abrasions and lameness in piglets born in different farrowing systems with different types of floor.

Authors:  Mate Zoric; Ebba Nilsson; Sigbrit Mattsson; Nils Lundeheim; Per Wallgren
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  3 in total

1.  The growth and reproduction performance of TALEN-mediated β-lactoglobulin-knockout bucks.

Authors:  Hengtao Ge; Chenchen Cui; Jun Liu; Yan Luo; Fusheng Quan; Yaping Jin; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  A site-specific recombinase-based method to produce antibiotic selectable marker free transgenic cattle.

Authors:  Yuan Yu; Yongsheng Wang; Qi Tong; Xu Liu; Feng Su; Fusheng Quan; Zekun Guo; Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessment of fecundity and germ line transmission in two transgenic pig lines produced by sleeping beauty transposition.

Authors:  Wiebke Garrels; Stephanie Holler; Nicole Cleve; Heiner Niemann; Zoltan Ivics; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.