Literature DB >> 17400972

Preweaning housing effects on behavior and physiological measures in pigs during the suckling and fattening periods.

H Chaloupková1, G Illmann, K Neuhauserová, M Tománek, L Valis.   

Abstract

The effect of the preweaning housing system on the stress response of pigs before weaning and during fattening was studied in 33 litters of domestic pigs. Three preweaning housing systems were compared: barren crate (standard farrowing crate without straw), enriched crate (20% larger crate, with straw), and as a control, a farrowing pen (pen, 60% larger than the barren crate, with straw). At 25 d of age, pigs were tested with an isolation test and 1 d later with a human approach test (HumanT). Pigs were weaned at 28 d of age. At 3 and 6 mo of age, pigs were tested with an isolation-human approach test. The latency and frequency of squeal calls and locomotor activity were analyzed for all 3 tests, whereas physical contact with the human was also analyzed for the HumanT and isolation-human approach test. At 6 mo of age, the pigs were transported to a slaughterhouse. One day before transport, immediately after transport, and 1 h after transport, saliva samples were taken for cortisol analysis. The pH of the LM was also measured 45 min after slaughter. Preweaning housing system affected (P < 0.05) the probability of squeal vocalizations, the latency of locomotion, and the duration of locomotion during the HumanT. Pigs from the enriched pens vocalized less, had a longer latency to move, and performed less overall locomotion than pigs from the barren crates. Preweaning housing system did not affect behavior of fattening pigs. Cortisol concentrations before and after transport were not affected by preweaning housing system. An interaction of cortisol concentrations and housing systems was observed between the control sample and the sample taken immediately after transport in pigs from the barren crates (P < 0.05) compared with pigs from the enriched housing systems. Meat from pigs reared in the barren crate tended to have lower pH (P < 0.10) and that of pigs reared in enriched crates had lower pH (P < 0.05) than meat of pigs reared in enriched pens. No differences were observed between pigs from barren or enriched crates. Our results suggest that enrichment of the preweaning environment through enlarged space, provision of straw, and free movement for the sow had a positive effect on the coping behavior of pigs before weaning and prevented an increase in salivary cortisol concentration immediately after transport and a decrease in meat pH 45 min postmortem at the age of 6 mo. Minimal enrichment of the commercial farrowing crate did not affect behavior and physiological measures in pigs before and after weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400972     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP).

Authors:  Reinhard C Huber; Liliana Remuge; Ailsa Carlisle; Simon Lillico; Peter Sandøe; Dorte B Sørensen; C Bruce A Whitelaw; I Anna S Olsson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Sow stress levels and behavior and piglet performances in farrowing crates and farrowing pens with temporary crating.

Authors:  Sébastien Goumon; Iva Leszkowová; Marie Šimecková; Gudrun Illmann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Porcine salivary analysis by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis in 3 models of acute stress: a pilot study.

Authors:  María Fuentes-Rubio; José J Cerón; Carlos de Torre; Damián Escribano; Ana M Gutiérrez; Fernando Tecles
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Relationship between Environmental Enrichment and the Response to Novelty in Laboratory-housed Pigs.

Authors:  Brittany L Backus; Mhairi A Sutherland; Tiffanie A Brooks
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Perinatal flavour learning and adaptation to being weaned: all the pig needs is smell.

Authors:  Marije Oostindjer; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Kristina Simon; Henry van den Brand; Bas Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  From "Animal Machines" to "Happy Meat"? Foucault's Ideas of Disciplinary and Pastoral Power Applied to 'Animal-Centred' Welfare Discourse.

Authors:  Matthew Cole
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Cortisol and secretory immunoglobulin A response to stress in German shepherd dogs.

Authors:  Ivona Svobodová; Helena Chaloupková; Roman Končel; Luděk Bartoš; Lenka Hradecká; Lukáš Jebavý
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of outdoor housing of piglets on behavior, stress reaction and meat characteristics.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yonezawa; Asahi Takahashi; Satomi Imai; Aya Okitsu; Sonomi Komiyama; Mami Irimajiri; Akihiro Matsuura; Atusi Yamazaki; Koich Hodate
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Enriched Housing Reduces Disease Susceptibility to Co-Infection with Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Virus (PRRSV) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (A. pleuropneumoniae) in Young Pigs.

Authors:  Ingrid D E van Dixhoorn; Inonge Reimert; Jenny Middelkoop; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Henk J Wisselink; Peter W G Groot Koerkamp; Bas Kemp; Norbert Stockhofe-Zurwieden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Alan J Tilbrook; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.