Literature DB >> 22171977

Prevalence, predictors, and patient outcomes associated with physician co-management: findings from the Los Angeles Women's Health Study.

Danielle E Rose1, Diana M Tisnado, May L Tao, Jennifer L Malin, John L Adams, Patricia A Ganz, Katherine L Kahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physician co-management, representing joint participation in the planning, decision-making, and delivery of care, is often cited in association with coordination of care. Yet little is known about how physicians manage tasks and how their management style impacts patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To describe physician practice style using breast cancer as a model. We characterize correlates and predictors of physician practice style for 10 clinical tasks, and then test for associations between physician practice style and patient ratings of care.
METHODS: We queried 347 breast cancer physicians identified by a population-based cohort of women with incident breast cancer regarding care using a clinical vignette about a hypothetical 65-year-old diabetic woman with incident breast cancer. To test the association between physician practice style and patient outcomes, we linked medical oncologists' responses to patient ratings of care (physician n=111; patient n=411).
RESULTS: After adjusting for physician and practice setting characteristics, physician practice style varied by physician specialty, practice setting, financial incentives, and barriers to referrals. Patients with medical oncologists who co-managed tasks had higher patient ratings of care.
CONCLUSION: Physician practice style for breast cancer is influenced by provider and practice setting characteristics, and it is an important predictor of patient ratings. We identify physician and practice setting factors associated with physician practice style and found associations between physician co-management and patient outcomes (e.g., patient ratings of care). © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22171977      PMCID: PMC3423183          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01359.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  45 in total

1.  Developing a reliable, valid, and feasible plan for quality-of-care measurement for cancer: how should we measure?

Authors:  Katherine L Kahn; Jennifer L Malin; John Adams; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Penetrating the "black box": financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services.

Authors:  Douglas A Conrad; Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 3.  Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice.

Authors:  Christopher J Stille; Anthony Jerant; Douglas Bell; David Meltzer; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Personal, organizational, and market level influences on physicians' practice patterns: results of a national survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  B E Landon; J Reschovsky; M Reed; D Blumenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Fragmentation of care for frequently hospitalized urban residents.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Feng Xu; Morgan Hanger; Elena Elkin; Nina A Bickell; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Navigating poorly charted territory: patient dilemmas in health care "nonsystems".

Authors:  Shoshanna Sofaer
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ann S O'Malley; Beny Wu; Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Cheryl J Wiese; Beth Kirlin; Sarah M Greene; Steven B Clauser; Edward H Wagner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Comorbidity and the use of primary care and specialist care in the elderly.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Klaus W Lemke; Robert Herbert; Wendy D Pavlovich; Gerard Anderson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.707

View more
  7 in total

1.  Oncologists' perspectives on post-cancer treatment communication and care coordination with primary care physicians.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; D Haggstrom; K L Kahn; S W Gray; B Kim; B Liu; J Eisenstein; N L Keating
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Is Self-Referral Associated with Higher Quality Care?

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Afshin Rastegar; Nancy L Keating; John L Adams; Maria Pisu; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Reducing the toxicity of cancer therapy: recognizing needs, taking action.

Authors:  Charles S Cleeland; Jeff D Allen; Samantha A Roberts; Joanna M Brell; Sergio A Giralt; Aarif Y Khakoo; Rebecca A Kirch; Virginia E Kwitkowski; Zhongxing Liao; Jamey Skillings
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Nurse Practitioner-Physician Comanagement: A Theoretical Model to Alleviate Primary Care Strain.

Authors:  Allison A Norful; Krystyna de Jacq; Richard Carlino; Lusine Poghosyan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Physician roles in the cancer-related follow-up care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Paul K J Han; Craig C Earle; Tenbroeck Smith; John Z Ayanian; Richard Lee; Anita Ambs; Julia H Rowland; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Associations of CAHPS Composites With Global Ratings of the Doctor Vary by Medicare Beneficiaries' Health Status.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Joshua S Mallett; Ann Haas; Katherine L Kahn; Steven C Martino; Sarah Gaillot; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Measuring patient safety culture in maternal and child health institutions in China: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Weiwei Liu; Huifeng Shi; Chaojie Liu; Yan Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.