Literature DB >> 25759002

Is Self-Referral Associated with Higher Quality Care?

Craig Evan Pollack1, Afshin Rastegar2, Nancy L Keating3,4, John L Adams5, Maria Pisu6, Katherine L Kahn7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which patients self-refer to cancer specialists and whether self-referral is associated with better experiences and quality of care. DATA SOURCES: Data from surveys and medical record abstraction collected through the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. STUDY
DESIGN: Observational study of patients with lung and colorectal cancer diagnosed from 2003 through 2005 in five geographically defined regions and five integrated health care delivery systems.
METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression models used to assess factors associated with self-referral and propensity score-weighted doubly robust models to test the association between self-referral and experiences/quality of care. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Among 5,882 patients, 9.7 percent of lung cancer patients and 14.9 percent of colorectal cancer patients self-referred to at least one cancer specialist. Black patients were less likely to self-refer than white patients (odds ratio: 0.48, 95 percent confidence interval: 0.35, 0.64); patients with high incomes (vs. low) and with a college degree (vs. non-high school graduates) were significantly more likely to self-refer. Self-referral was associated with lower ratings of overall physician communication for patients with lung cancer but, conversely, higher odds of curative surgery among patients with stage I/II lung cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: A small but significant proportion of patients self-referred to their cancer specialists; rates varied by patient race and socioeconomic status. To the extent that self-referral is associated with quality, it may reinforce disparities in care. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Self-referral; colorectal cancer; lung cancer; referral

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25759002      PMCID: PMC4600357          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  26 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  R D Hays; J A Shaul; V S Williams; J S Lubalin; L D Harris-Kojetin; S F Sweeny; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Patterns of referral among internists in private practice: a social exchange model.

Authors:  S M Shortell
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1973-12

3.  Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Nancy L Keating; Nicholas A Christakis; A James O'Malley; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Christopher B Forrest; Caroline Y Lin
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-28

6.  Prevalence, predictors, and patient outcomes associated with physician co-management: findings from the Los Angeles Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Danielle E Rose; Diana M Tisnado; May L Tao; Jennifer L Malin; John L Adams; Patricia A Ganz; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Patterns and correlates of patient referral to surgeons for treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Timothy P Hofer; Sarah Hawley; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Patients' experiences with care for lung cancer and colorectal cancer: findings from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Alan M Zaslavsky; Neeraj K Arora; Katherine L Kahn; Jennifer L Malin; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Mark C Hornbrook; Catarina I Kiefe; Yulei He; Julie M Urmie; Jane C Weeks; David P Harrington
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ann S O'Malley; Beny Wu; Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Referrals to high-quality cardiac surgeons: patients' race and characteristics of their physicians.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  3 in total

1.  Second opinions from urologists for prostate cancer: Who gets them, why, and their link to treatment.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; David Grande; Nandita Mitra; Justin Bekelman; Christian Stillson; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Does having a usual primary care provider reduce patient self-referrals in rural China's rural multi-tiered medical system? A retrospective study in Qianjiang District, China.

Authors:  Da Feng; Donglan Zhang; Boyang Li; Yan Zhang; Ray Serrano; Danxiang Shi; Yuan Liu; Liang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Second opinions in medical oncology.

Authors:  Ian Olver; Mariko Carey; Jamie Bryant; Allison Boyes; Tiffany Evans; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.234

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.