Literature DB >> 16708005

Fragmentation of care for frequently hospitalized urban residents.

Deborah Schrag1, Feng Xu, Morgan Hanger, Elena Elkin, Nina A Bickell, Peter B Bach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragmentation across sites of care may impede efficient healthcare delivery.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate fragmentation of hospital care for chronically ill New York City (NYC) residents and its association with enrollment in the New York State (NYS) Medicaid program. RESEARCH
DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the NYS Department of Health's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System discharge database. We identified 53,031 NYC residents admitted 3 or more times to acute care hospitals between 2000 and 2002 with the same principal diagnosis of a specific chronic illness (diabetes, sickle cell anemia, psychosis, substance abuse, cancer, gastrointestinal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma, coronary artery disease, or congestive heart failure). We also evaluated a larger cohort of 225,421 patients with >or=3 admissions for a specific chronic illness coded as either the principal or a secondary diagnosis. A generalized logit model was used to examine the relationship between fragmentation and each patient's primary insurance adjusted for diagnosis and demographic characteristics. MEASURES: Fragmentation was characterized as high, moderate, or low based on the number of distinct hospitals a patient visited relative to the patient's total number of hospitalizations over the 3-year interval.
RESULTS: Among frequently hospitalized NYC residents with select chronic conditions, 17.1% experienced highly fragmented care. This rate was 9.9% for patients with commercial insurance, 24.4% for those with Medicaid, and 9.7% for those with Medicare. The unadjusted odds ratio describing high fragmentation of Medicaid enrollees compared with commercially insured patients was 3.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.50-4.18) and, although attenuated, remained significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.47). The strongest predictor of fragmentation was a diagnosis of psychosis (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.43-3.25) or substance abuse (OR, 7.58; 95% CI, 6.55-8.77).
CONCLUSIONS: In NYC, Medicaid enrollment is associated with greater fragmentation of hospital care, but this is largely attributable to the preponderance of Medicaid enrollees with diagnoses of psychosis and substance abuse. Strategies to improve the efficiency of healthcare delivery should focus on patients with mental illness who are frequently admitted to general hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708005     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215811.68308.ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  25 in total

1.  Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  High-Cost Patients: Hot-Spotters Don't Explain the Half of It.

Authors:  Natalie S Lee; Noah Whitman; Nirav Vakharia; Glen B Taksler; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Postoperative care fragmentation and thirty-day unplanned readmissions after head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Dorina Kallogjeri; Mohammed J Saeed; Margaret A Olsen; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Disease Outcomes and Care Fragmentation Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Theresa L Walunas; Kathryn L Jackson; Anh H Chung; Karen A Mancera-Cuevas; Daniel L Erickson; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Abel Kho
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Leveraging health information exchange for clinical research: Extreme underreporting of hospital service utilization among patients with substance use disorders.

Authors:  Jan Gryczynski; Courtney D Nordeck; Ross D Martin; Christopher Welsh; Robert P Schwartz; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Jerome H Jaffe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Rehospitalization and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment entry among patients seen by a hospital SUD consultation-liaison service.

Authors:  Courtney D Nordeck; Christopher Welsh; Robert P Schwartz; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Art Cohen; Kevin E O'Grady; Jan Gryczynski
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Index versus Non-index Readmission After Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Where Do Patients Go to Be Readmitted?

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Fabio Bagante; Anghela Paredes; Qinyu Chen; Ozgur Akgul; Katiuscha Merath; Mary E Dillhoff; Jordan M Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Migration of patients between five urban teaching hospitals in Chicago.

Authors:  William L Galanter; Andrew Applebaum; Viveka Boddipalli; Abel Kho; Michael Lin; David Meltzer; Anna Roberts; Bill Trick; Surrey M Walton; Bruce L Lambert
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Factors Associated With Seeking Physician Care by Medicare Beneficiaries Who Receive All Their Primary Care From Nurse Practitioners.

Authors:  Michelle Y Raji; Nai-Wei Chen; Mukaila Raji; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-07-25

10.  Medicaid patients at high risk for frequent hospital admission: real-time identification and remediable risks.

Authors:  Maria C Raven; John C Billings; Lewis R Goldfrank; Eric D Manheimer; Marc N Gourevitch
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.