Literature DB >> 11468507

Personal, organizational, and market level influences on physicians' practice patterns: results of a national survey of primary care physicians.

B E Landon1, J Reschovsky, M Reed, D Blumenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the principal tenets of managed care is that physicians' clinical decisions can be influenced both to improve the quality and consistency of care and to decrease health care expenditures. Medical decision making, however, remains a complex phenomenon and the most important determinants of physicians' approaches to clinical decision making remain poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES: To determine how clinical decisions are associated with individual characteristics, practice setting and organizational characteristics, attributes of the patient population under care, and the market environment. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of patient-care physicians.
SUBJECTS: Primary care physicians who provide direct patient care at least 20 hours per week. MEASURES: Proportion of physicians who would order a referral, diagnostic test, or treatment for 5 clinical scenarios thought to be representative of discretionary medical decisions.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 4,825 primary care physicians who cared for adult patients (Response Rate 65%). The distribution of results for each of the five clinical scenarios demonstrates significant variability both within and between physicians. No evidence was seen of a consistent practice style across the vignettes (eg, "aggressive" or "conservative"). The organizational setting of practice was the most consistent predictor of behavior across all the clinical scenarios, with the exception of back pain, which was minimally related to any of the environmental factors. When compared to physicians in solo practice, physicians in all other practice settings were less likely to order a test or referral or pursue treatment. Practice involvement with managed care and measures of financial influences and administrative strategies associated with managed care were minimally and inconsistently associated with reported physician behaviors.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability of managed care to improve the quality and consistency of care while also controlling the costs of care depends on its ability to influence medical decisions. Our findings generally demonstrate that managed care has a weak influence on discretionary medical decisions and that the influence of managed care pales in comparison to personal and practice setting influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11468507     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  36 in total

1.  Radiologist uncertainty and the interpretation of screening.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore; Linn A Abraham; Martha S Gerrity; R Edward Hendrick; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Steven P Poplack; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Analysis of Physician Variation in Provision of Low-Value Services.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Anupam B Jena; Alan M Zaslavsky; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Transforming medical care: case study of an exemplary, small medical group.

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; Mary C Hroscikoski; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen; Peter G Harper; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  How effectively does medical care achieve its purposes? Evaluation of peer-reviewed literature in ophthalmology related to wellness.

Authors:  George L Spaeth; Daniela S Monteiro de Barros; Moataz Gheith; Ghada Ali Siam; Mehul Nagarsheth
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Effects of practice setting on GPs' provision of care.

Authors:  Roxane Borgès Da Silva; André-Pierre Contandriopoulos; Raynald Pineault; Pierre Tousignant
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Methods of Observing Variations in Physicians' Decisions: The Opportunities of Clinical Vignettes.

Authors:  Lara Converse; Kirsten Barrett; Eugene Rich; James Reschovsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Provider Differences in Use of Implanted Ports in Older Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Elena B Elkin; Coral L Atoria; Camelia S Sima; Andrew S Epstein; Victoria Blinder; Kent A Sepkowitz; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The role of training environment care intensity in US physician cost consciousness.

Authors:  Kira L Ryskina; Scott D Halpern; Nancy S Minyanou; Susan D Goold; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Providers' experiences treating chronic pain among opioid-dependent drug users.

Authors:  Karina M Berg; Julia H Arnsten; Galit Sacajiu; Alison Karasz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Determinants of surgical decision making: a national survey.

Authors:  Niamey P Wilson; Francis P Wilson; Mark Neuman; Andrew Epstein; Richard Bell; Katrina Armstrong; Kenric Murayama
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.