OBJECTIVE: To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. METHODS: Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). RESULTS: Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research.
OBJECTIVE: To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. METHODS: Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). RESULTS: Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research.
Authors: Stuart J Beatty; Katherine A Kelley; Anne H Metzger; Katherine L Bellebaum; James W McAuley Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Kristin K Janke; Hazel H Seaba; Lynda S Welage; Steven A Scott; Suzanne M Rabi; Katherine A Kelley; Holly L Mason Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Marilyn K Speedie; Jeffrey N Baldwin; Rodney A Carter; Cynthia L Raehl; Victor A Yanchick; Lucinda L Maine Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Beth E Welch; Sally A Arif; Timothy J Bloom; Alex N Isaacs; Kristin K Janke; Jessica L Johnson; Lindsey E Moseley; Libby J Ross Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.047