Literature DB >> 22171086

Morphological and kinematic basis of the hummingbird flight stroke: scaling of flight muscle transmission ratio.

Tyson L Hedrick1, Bret W Tobalske, Ivo G Ros, Douglas R Warrick, Andrew A Biewener.   

Abstract

Hummingbirds (Trochilidae) are widely known for their insect-like flight strokes characterized by high wing beat frequency, small muscle strains and a highly supinated wing orientation during upstroke that allows for lift production in both halves of the stroke cycle. Here, we show that hummingbirds achieve these functional traits within the limits imposed by a vertebrate endoskeleton and muscle physiology by accentuating a wing inversion mechanism found in other birds and using long-axis rotational movement of the humerus. In hummingbirds, long-axis rotation of the humerus creates additional wing translational movement, supplementing that produced by the humeral elevation and depression movements of a typical avian flight stroke. This adaptation increases the wing-to-muscle-transmission ratio, and is emblematic of a widespread scaling trend among flying animals whereby wing-to-muscle-transmission ratio varies inversely with mass, allowing animals of vastly different sizes to accommodate aerodynamic, biomechanical and physiological constraints on muscle-powered flapping flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22171086      PMCID: PMC3311889          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Comparative trends in shortening velocity and force production in skeletal muscles.

Authors:  Scott Medler
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Cardiac-like behavior of an insect flight muscle.

Authors:  Michael S Tu; Thomas L Daniel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A cineradiographic analysis of bird flight: the wishbone in starlings is a spring.

Authors:  F A Jenkins; K P Dial; G E Goslow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Brainerd; David B Baier; Stephen M Gatesy; Tyson L Hedrick; Keith A Metzger; Susannah L Gilbert; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-06-01

5.  Scaling of mechanical power output during burst escape flight in the Corvidae.

Authors:  Brandon E Jackson; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Contraction dynamics and power output of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  R K Josephson
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 19.318

7.  Effects of flight speed upon muscle activity in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske; Andrew A Biewener; Douglas R Warrick; Tyson L Hedrick; Donald R Powers
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Oxygen consumption rates in hovering hummingbirds reflect substrate-dependent differences in P/O ratios: carbohydrate as a 'premium fuel'.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch; Douglas L Altshuler; Raul K Suarez
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The contractile properties of the M. supracoracoideus In the pigeon and starling: a case for long-axis rotation of the humerus

Authors:  S O Poore; A Ashcroft; A Sánchez-Haiman; G E Goslow
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  Structure of the vortex wake in hovering Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  M Wolf; V M Ortega-Jimenez; R Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  How pigeons couple three-dimensional elbow and wrist motion to morph their wings.

Authors:  Amanda K Stowers; Laura Y Matloff; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Myosin heavy-chain isoforms in the flight and leg muscles of hummingbirds and zebra finches.

Authors:  Brandy P Velten; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Three-dimensional flow and lift characteristics of a hovering ruby-throated hummingbird.

Authors:  Jialei Song; Haoxiang Luo; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Three-dimensional, high-resolution skeletal kinematics of the avian wing and shoulder during ascending flapping flight and uphill flap-running.

Authors:  David B Baier; Stephen M Gatesy; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Three-dimensional simulation for fast forward flight of a calliope hummingbird.

Authors:  Jialei Song; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers; Tyson L Hedrick; Haoxiang Luo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Dimitri A Skandalis; Paolo S Segre; Joseph W Bahlman; Derrick J E Groom; Kenneth C Welch; Christopher C Witt; Jimmy A McGuire; Robert Dudley; David Lentink; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.