Literature DB >> 9359888

The contractile properties of the M. supracoracoideus In the pigeon and starling: a case for long-axis rotation of the humerus

S O Poore, A Ashcroft, A Sánchez-Haiman, G E Goslow.   

Abstract

Wing upstroke in birds capable of powered flight is kinematically the most complicated phase of the wingbeat cycle. The M. supracoracoideus (SC), generally considered to be the primary elevator of the wing, is a muscle with a highly derived but stereotyped morphology in modern flying birds. The contractile portion of the SC arises from a ventral sternum, but its tendon of insertion courses above the glenohumeral joint to insert on the dorsal surface of the humerus. To clarify the role of the SC during wing upstroke, we studied its contractile and mechanical properties in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and pigeons (Columba livia), two birds with contrasting flight styles. We made in situ measurements of isometric forces of humeral elevation and humeral rotation and, in addition, measured the extent of unrestrained humeral excursion during stimulation of the muscle nerve. We also generated passive and active length-force curves for the SC of each species. Stimulation of the SC at humeral joint angles of elevation/depression and protraction/retraction coincident with the downstroke-upstroke transition and mid-upstroke produced substantially higher forces of long-axis rotation than elevation. When the humerus was allowed to move (rotate/elevate) during stimulation, we observed rotation about its longitudinal axis of up to 70-80 degrees , but humeral elevations of only 40-60 degrees above the horizontal (as measured in lateral view). In the active length-force experiments, we measured mean (+/-s.d.) maximal tetanic forces of 6.5+/-1.2 N for starlings (N=4) and 39.4+/-6.2 N for pigeons (N=6), unexpectedly high forces approximately 10 times body weight. The working range of the SC in both species corresponds to the ascending limb (but not the plateau) of the active length-force curve. The potential for greatest active force is high on the ascending limb at joint angles coincident with the downstroke-upstroke transition, a time when the humerus is depressed below the horizontal and rotated forward maximally. As the SC shortens to counterrotate and elevate the humerus during early upstroke, the potential for active force at shorter lengths declines at a relatively rapid rate. These findings reveal that the primary role of the SC is to impart a high-velocity rotation of the humerus about its longitudinal axis, which rapidly elevates the distal wing. This rapid twisting of the humerus is responsible for positioning the forearm and hand so that their subsequent extension orients the outstretched wing in the parasagittal plane appropriate for the subsequent downstroke. We propose that, at the downstroke-upstroke transition, variable levels of co-contraction of the M. pectoralis and SC interact to provide a level of kinematic control at the shoulder that would not be possible were the two antagonists to work independently. The lack of a morphologically derived SC in Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous birds precluded a high-velocity recovery stroke which undoubtedly limited powered flight in these forms. Subsequent evolution of the derived SC capable of imparting a large rotational force to the humerus about its longitudinal axis was an important step in the evolution of the wing upstroke and in the ability to supinate (circumflex) the manus in early upstroke, a movement fundamental to reducing air resistance during the recovery stroke.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9359888     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.23.2987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Glycolysis activity in flight muscles of birds according to their physiological function. An experimental model in vitro to study aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis activity separately.

Authors:  David Meléndez-Morales; Patricia de Paz-Lugo; Enrique Meléndez-Hevia
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Morphological and kinematic basis of the hummingbird flight stroke: scaling of flight muscle transmission ratio.

Authors:  Tyson L Hedrick; Bret W Tobalske; Ivo G Ros; Douglas R Warrick; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Wing Musculature Reconstruction in Extinct Flightless Auks (Pinguinus and Mancalla) Reveals Incomplete Convergence with Penguins (Spheniscidae) Due to Differing Ancestral States.

Authors:  Junya Watanabe; Daniel J Field; Hiroshige Matsuoka
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  Tuning of feedforward control enables stable muscle force-length dynamics after loss of autogenic proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Joanne C Gordon; Natalie C Holt; Andrew Biewener; Monica A Daley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Building a Bird: Musculoskeletal Modeling and Simulation of Wing-Assisted Incline Running During Avian Ontogeny.

Authors:  Ashley M Heers; Jeffery W Rankin; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.