Literature DB >> 15973407

Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird.

Douglas R Warrick1, Bret W Tobalske, Donald R Powers.   

Abstract

Despite profound musculoskeletal differences, hummingbirds (Trochilidae) are widely thought to employ aerodynamic mechanisms similar to those used by insects. The kinematic symmetry of the hummingbird upstroke and downstroke has led to the assumption that these halves of the wingbeat cycle contribute equally to weight support during hovering, as exhibited by insects of similar size. This assumption has been applied, either explicitly or implicitly, in widely used aerodynamic models and in a variety of empirical tests. Here we provide measurements of the wake of hovering rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) obtained with digital particle image velocimetry that show force asymmetry: hummingbirds produce 75% of their weight support during the downstroke and only 25% during the upstroke. Some of this asymmetry is probably due to inversion of their cambered wings during upstroke. The wake of hummingbird wings also reveals evidence of leading-edge vortices created during the downstroke, indicating that they may operate at Reynolds numbers sufficiently low to exploit a key mechanism typical of insect hovering. Hummingbird hovering approaches that of insects, yet remains distinct because of effects resulting from an inherently dissimilar-avian-body plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973407     DOI: 10.1038/nature03647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  47 in total

1.  Pigeons steer like helicopters and generate down- and upstroke lift during low speed turns.

Authors:  Ivo G Ros; Lori C Bassman; Marc A Badger; Alyssa N Pierson; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Leading edge vortex in a slow-flying passerine.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Kenneth C Welch; Brian H Cho; Danny B Welch; Amy F Lin; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  A quantitative comparison of bird and bat wakes.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Marta Wolf; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Structure of the vortex wake in hovering Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  M Wolf; V M Ortega-Jimenez; R Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström; Geoffrey Spedding
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Volumetric imaging of shark tail hydrodynamics reveals a three-dimensional dual-ring vortex wake structure.

Authors:  Brooke E Flammang; George V Lauder; Daniel R Troolin; Tyson Strand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Melissa S Bowlin; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.