UNLABELLED: Countermeasures are desirable to retard bone loss during long-term space flight. We evaluated the effect of an intervention protocol on bed rest-induced bone loss. INTRODUCTION: We developed a resistive vibration exercise (RVE) platform to test if an intervention RVE protocol would be effective to protect bed rest-induced bone loss. METHODS:Fourteen male subjects were assigned randomly to either the RVE group (n = 7) that performed daily supervised resistive vibration exercise or to the no any exercise control (CON) group (n = 7). Both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography were used to monitor changes in bone mineral density. RESULTS:RVE significantly prevented bone loss at multiple skeletal sites, including calcaneus, distal tibia, hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4). The ratio of urinary calcium and creatinine was found higher after starting bed rest in CON group while no significant changes were observed in RVE group. No significant temporal change was found for osteocalcin-N during and after bed rest in CON group. However, a significant increase was shown after bed rest in RVE group. In both groups, the urinary concentration of bone resorption markers, such as C-telopeptide of typeI collagen (CTX-I) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD), were significantly elevated after bed rest. In the CON group, no significant temporal effect was found for hydroxyproline (HOP), CTX-I, and DPD during bed rest and the serum concentration of HOP and TGF-β significantly increased about 52.04% and 24.03%, respectively only after bed rest. However, all these markers tended to decrease in the RVE group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results might imply that the intervention of RVE retarded bone loss induced by simulated microgravity in humans that was mainly attributed to its anabolic effects.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Countermeasures are desirable to retard bone loss during long-term space flight. We evaluated the effect of an intervention protocol on bed rest-induced bone loss. INTRODUCTION: We developed a resistive vibration exercise (RVE) platform to test if an intervention RVE protocol would be effective to protect bed rest-induced bone loss. METHODS: Fourteen male subjects were assigned randomly to either the RVE group (n = 7) that performed daily supervised resistive vibration exercise or to the no any exercise control (CON) group (n = 7). Both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography were used to monitor changes in bone mineral density. RESULTS: RVE significantly prevented bone loss at multiple skeletal sites, including calcaneus, distal tibia, hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4). The ratio of urinary calcium and creatinine was found higher after starting bed rest in CON group while no significant changes were observed in RVE group. No significant temporal change was found for osteocalcin-N during and after bed rest in CON group. However, a significant increase was shown after bed rest in RVE group. In both groups, the urinary concentration of bone resorption markers, such as C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD), were significantly elevated after bed rest. In the CON group, no significant temporal effect was found for hydroxyproline (HOP), CTX-I, and DPD during bed rest and the serum concentration of HOP and TGF-β significantly increased about 52.04% and 24.03%, respectively only after bed rest. However, all these markers tended to decrease in the RVE group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results might imply that the intervention of RVE retarded bone loss induced by simulated microgravity in humans that was mainly attributed to its anabolic effects.
Authors: Liqin Xie; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Edna S Choi; Bhavin Busa; Leah Rae Donahue; Lisa M Miller; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex Journal: Bone Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Jörn Rittweger; Gisela Beller; Gabriele Armbrecht; Edwin Mulder; Björn Buehring; Ulf Gast; Fernando Dimeo; Harald Schubert; Arnold de Haan; Dick F Stegeman; Hans Schiessl; Dieter Felsenberg Journal: Bone Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: J Rittweger; D Belavy; P Hunek; U Gast; H Boerst; B Feilcke; G Armbrecht; E Mulder; H Schubert; C Richardson; A de Haan; D F Stegeman; H Schiessl; D Felsenberg Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Sarah E Warner; David A Sanford; Blair A Becker; Steven D Bain; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross Journal: Bone Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: C T Rubin; E Capilla; Y K Luu; B Busa; H Crawford; D J Nolan; V Mittal; C J Rosen; J E Pessin; S Judex Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott M Smith; Janis E Davis-Street; J Vernell Fesperman; Myra D Smith; Barbara L Rice; Sara R Zwart Journal: J Nutr Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kwok Sui Leung; Hong Fei Shi; Wing Hoi Cheung; Ling Qin; Wai Kin Ng; Kam Fai Tam; Ning Tang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: K S Leung; C Y Li; Y K Tse; T K Choy; P C Leung; V W Y Hung; S Y Chan; A H C Leung; W H Cheung Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Haobo Jia; Aixian Tian; Xiaoyu Zhang; Xinlong Ma; Jianxiong Ma; Jie Wang; Lei Sun; Bin Lu Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte Journal: Sports Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Joel Edionwe; Cameron Hess; Javier Fernandez-Rio; David N Herndon; Clark R Andersen; Gordon L Klein; Oscar E Suman; William E Amonette Journal: Burns Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: K-S Leung; Y-H Li; Y Liu; H Wang; K-F Tam; D Hk Chow; Y Wan; S Ling; Z Dai; L Qin; W-H Cheung Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.041