Literature DB >> 22159253

Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Stefano Urso1, Justo Rafael Sadaba, Matteo Pettinari.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, does the off-pump to on-pump conversion rate have an impact on post-operative results? Altogether more than 420 papers were found using the reported search, of which 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated and ordered according to the sample size. In the 14 RCTs reviewed, the off-pump to on-pump conversion rate incidence ranged from 0 to 13.3%. The most frequent causes of conversion were haemodynamic instability and intramyocardial-coronary target. A low conversion rate (<2%) was reported by five studies. Three of them did not show any difference in terms of mortality between the OPCAB and on-pump groups, one showed better survival of the OPCAB group at 5 years, and one reported better early survival of the OPCAB group. Three of these trials describe a high OPCAB experience and reported that patients undergoing OPCAB had a shorter post-operative stay and lower morbidity compared with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Five RCTs showed a high conversion rate (>9%), and among them, one reported lower morbidity of the OPCAB patients, three were not able to show any benefit in terms of morbidity of the OPCAB, and one reported worse survival and patency graft rate of the OPCAB group. Four RCTs reported conversion rates ranging from 3.7 to 7.0%, describing a wide spectrum of results. We conclude that RCTs with a high off-pump to on-pump conversion rate were often associated with a lower experience in OPCAB of the surgeons participating in the trials. These studies were also mostly unable to show any benefit in terms of mortality or morbidity of OPCAB over the on-pump strategy. On the contrary, a low conversion rate is mostly reported by RCTs with a high structured experience in OPCAB. These trials were mostly able to show a benefit, in terms of morbidity and survival, of the OPCAB over the on-pump strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159253      PMCID: PMC3279983          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivr071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  20 in total

1.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Claudio Muneretto; Gianluigi Bisleri; Alberto Negri; Jacopo Manfredi; Marco Metra; Savina Nodari; Livio Dei Cas
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Clinical and radiologic outcome of off-pump coronary surgery at 12 months follow-up: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Per Snorre Lingaas; Per Kristian Hol; Runar Lundblad; Kjell Arne Rein; Lars Mathisen; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Rune Andersen; Erik Thaulow; Tor Inge Tønnesen; Jan Ludvig Svennevig; Sigurd Nitter Hauge; Per Morten Fredriksen; Marit Andersen; Erik Fosse
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS.

Authors:  Joel Dunning; Brian Prendergast; Kevin Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-12

4.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Masoumali Masoumi; Mohammad R Saidi; Farhanaz Rostami; Helen Sepahi; Daem Roushani
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2008-01

5.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  A Laurie Shroyer; Frederick L Grover; Brack Hattler; Joseph F Collins; Gerald O McDonald; Elizabeth Kozora; John C Lucke; Janet H Baltz; Dimitri Novitzky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Five-year follow-up of a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump stable multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. The MASS III Trial.

Authors:  Whady Hueb; Neuza H Lopes; Alexandre C Pereira; Alexandre C Hueb; Paulo Rogério Soares; Desidério Favarato; Ricardo D'Oliveira Vieira; Eduardo Gomes Lima; Cibele Larrosa Garzillo; Felipe da Silva Paulitch; Luiz A M César; Bernard J Gersh; José A F Ramires
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Medium-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on pump versus off pump: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wojtek Karolak; Gregory Hirsch; Karen Buth; Jean-Francois Légaré
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Neurocognitive outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Felix Hernandez; Jeremiah R Brown; Donald S Likosky; Robert A Clough; Anne L Hess; Robert M Roth; Cathy S Ross; Cindy M Whited; Gerald T O'Connor; John D Klemperer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Natasha E Khan; Anthony De Souza; Rebecca Mister; Marcus Flather; Jonathan Clague; Simon Davies; Peter Collins; Duolao Wang; Ulrich Sigwart; John Pepper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Khalil Fattouch; Francesco Guccione; Pietro Dioguardi; Roberta Sampognaro; Egle Corrado; Marco Caruso; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications.

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; B C Ramesh; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-11

2.  Role of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis on Intraoperative Conversion and Mortality in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass.

Authors:  Jeng-Wei Chen; Cheng-Hsin Lin; Ron-Bin Hsu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  The π-Circuit Technique in Coronary Surgery: Analysis of 1359 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Sotirios N Prapas; Ioannis A Pangiotopoulos; Vasileios N Leivaditis; Konstantinos P Katsavrias; Vasiliki S Prapa; Ioannis N Linardakis; Efstratios N Koletsis; Konstantinos Grapatsas
Journal:  Open J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-27

4.  Conversion during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A case-control study.

Authors:  Murali Chakravarthy; Dattatreya Prabhakumar; T A Patil; Antony George; Vivek Jawali
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.