Literature DB >> 12963199

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study.

Claudio Muneretto1, Gianluigi Bisleri, Alberto Negri, Jacopo Manfredi, Marco Metra, Savina Nodari, Livio Dei Cas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery should be the procedure of choice in total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 176 patients undergoing total arterial myocardial revascularization and assigned them at random to one of two groups: group 1 was composed of 88 patients undergoing coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); group 2 consisted of 88 patients receiving the OPCAB procedure. We excluded from this study patients with significant risk factors for CPB-related morbidity. Composite arterial grafts in Y-T shape were realized in three different configurations according to patients' characteristics, coronary anatomy, and target stenosis.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative characteristics and risk factors (Euroscore: group 1 = 6.1 +/- 3.5, group 2 = 6.6 +/- 3.8). Mean number of anastomoses was similar in both groups (group 1 = 2.8 +/- 0.8, group 2 = 2.7 +/- 0.5) whereas mean mechanical ventilation time (group 1 = 23 +/- 9 hours, group 2 = 9 +/- 4 hours), intensive care unit stay (group 1 = 43 +/- 6 hours, group 2 = 22 +/- 8 hours), and postoperative stay (group 1 = 7 +/- 3 days, group 2 = 5 +/- 2 days) were significantly reduced in group 2. Early mortality was 2.3% in group 1 and 3.4% in group 2 (p = not significant). Major postoperative complications occurred similarly in the two groups (atrial fibrillation: group 1 = 35.2%, group 2 = 21.6%; myocardial infarction: group 1 = 2.2%, group 2 = 1.1%; stroke: group 1 = 2.2%, group 2 = 0%; abdominal infarction: group 1 = 3.4%, group 2 = 0%). At follow-up (mean, 15 +/- 12 months) no significant differences were observed in terms of survival free of any cardiac-related event (group 1 = 94.3%, group 2 = 96.5%; p = not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery could be successfully used for total arterial grafting without compromising the completeness of revascularization. Avoidance of CPB significantly decreased mechanical ventilation support and length of intensive care unit and postoperative stay; however in the absence of risk factors for cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump coronary artery surgery did not improve early and midterm clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12963199     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00564-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pump or no pump for coronary artery bypass: current best available evidence.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 2.  A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Rong Chu; Richard Whitlock; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Efficacy of Elective Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Therapy for High-Risk Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mizuho Imamaki; Kaoru Matsuura; Yuriko Niitsuma; Hitoshi Shimura; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2009-12-14

Review 4.  Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications.

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; B C Ramesh; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-11

5.  Incidence of atrial fibrillation after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and propensity score matching trials.

Authors:  Chuang-Yan Wu; Si-Hua Wang; Yu-Qiang Shang; Jia-Hong Xia
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21

Review 6.  Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  Stefano Urso; Justo Rafael Sadaba; Matteo Pettinari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-28

7.  A comparison of long-term mortality for off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Chuntao Wu; Fabian T Camacho; Alfred T Culliford; Jeffrey P Gold; Andrew S Wechsler; Robert S D Higgins; Stephen J Lahey; Craig R Smith; Desmond Jordan; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-10

8.  Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey.

Authors:  Lars G Hemkens; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-08

9.  Preoperative hematocrit concentration and the risk of stroke in patients undergoing isolated coronary-artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Khaled M Musallam; Faek R Jamali; Frits R Rosendaal; Toby Richards; Donat R Spahn; Kaivan Khavandi; Iskandar Barakat; Benjamin Demoss; Luca A Lotta; Flora Peyvandi; Pier M Sfeir
Journal:  Anemia       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 10.  The impact of off-pump surgery in end-organ function: practical end-points.

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; Simon Mbarushimana; Bandigowdanapalya C Ramesh; Mondrian Parissis; Savvas Lampridis; Peter Mhandu; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.