Literature DB >> 19258083

Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized trial.

Khalil Fattouch1, Francesco Guccione, Pietro Dioguardi, Roberta Sampognaro, Egle Corrado, Marco Caruso, Giovanni Ruvolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Conventional cardioplegic arrest coronary artery bypass grafting after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The benefits of off-pump surgery have been suggested. This study randomly evaluated the impact of the off-pump technique on clinical results.
METHODS: Between February 2002 and October 2007, 128 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent myocardial revascularization within 48 hours from the onset of symptoms were randomly assigned to 2 groups: on-pump group (66 patients/51.5%) and off-pump group (63 patients/48.5%). The primary end point was the incidence of in-hospital death and outcomes (low cardiac output syndrome, prolonged mechanical and pharmacologic cardiac support, prolonged mechanical ventilation support, and postoperative length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital). The secondary end point was the evaluation of myocardial infarct size measured by the perioperative serum release of cardiac troponin I and the improvement of contractile cardiac function evaluated by the wall motion score index.
RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 4.6%. In-hospital mortality was 7.7% (5 patients) in the on-pump group and 1.6% (1 patient) in the off-pump group (P = .04). Statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups concerning the incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (P = .001), time of inotrope drugs support (P = .001), time of mechanical ventilation (P = .006), reoperation for bleeding (P = .04), intensive care unit stay (P = .01), and in-hospital stay (P = .02). Statistically significant differences also were found between the 2 groups concerning the incidence of in-hospital death in patients who were admitted to surgery in cardiac shock (P = .0018) and patients who underwent surgery within 6 hours from the onset of symptoms (P = .0026). The procedure in 1 patient (1.6%) in the off-pump group was converted to the on-pump beating heart technique. The serum levels of cardiac troponin I were high in the on-pump group during the first 48 hours after surgery. Myocardial function was better in the off-pump group. There were no cardiac-related late deaths, and patients had no recurrent cardiac events.
CONCLUSION: Off-pump surgery reduced early mortality and morbidity in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in respect to the conventional procedure. Off-pump surgery showed better results than on-pump surgery in patients who underwent surgery within 6 hours from the onset of symptoms and in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258083     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  13 in total

1.  The current status of multi-arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki; Asai Tohru
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Victor F Seabra; Sami Alobaidi; Ethan M Balk; Alan H Poon; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Christian H Møller; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  Stefano Urso; Justo Rafael Sadaba; Matteo Pettinari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-28

5.  Use of cardiopulmonary pump support during coronary artery bypass grafting in the high-risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Yousif; D Addison; N Lakkis; T Rosengart; S S Virani; Y Birnbaum; M Alam
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Current outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Daniel Fudulu; Umberto Benedetto; Gustavo Guida Pecchinenda; Pierpaolo Chivasso; Vito Domenico Bruno; Filippo Rapetto; Alan Bryan; Gianni Davide Angelini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Leanne Harling; Hutan Ashrafian; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11-25

8.  Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey.

Authors:  Lars G Hemkens; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-08

Review 9.  Myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation; Why hasn't it convinced yet?

Authors:  Efstratios Apostolakis; Nikolaos A Papakonstantinou; Ioanna Koniari
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Off- Versus On-Pump Coronary Surgery and the Effect of Follow-Up Length and Surgeons' Experience: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Umberto Benedetto; Faisal Bakaeen; Mohamed Rahouma; Derrick Y Tam; Ahmed Abouarab; Antonino Di Franco; Jeremy Leonard; Adham Elmously; John D Puskas; Gianni D Angelini; Leonard N Girardi; Stephen E Fremes; David P Taggart
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.