Literature DB >> 2215411

Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio.

H P Chan1, K L Lam, Y Z Wu.   

Abstract

We developed a theoretical model which describes the improvement of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by a grid in digital radiography. The model takes into account the effects of spatial variations in the scatter-to-primary ratio and in the large-area contrast over an image with structured background on quantum noise, and the effects of noise in the imaging system such as electronic noise and digitization noise. Based on the theoretical model, we analyzed the effects of these factors on the SNR when a grid is employed. We performed experimental measurements to evaluate the improvement in the SNR by a grid when quantum noise is the dominant noise source. It was found that the measured SNR improvement factor due to quantum noise agreed closely with that determined from the measured transmission values of a grid, as predicted from our theoretical model. In order to evaluate the relative performance of grids with various geometric design parameters for digital radiographic systems, we employed Monte Carlo calculations and determined the transmission values of a number of grids under various scatter conditions. The calculated SNR improvement factor, due to quantum noise, correlated well with the measured improvement of the SNR by the grids. Our model predicts that the SNR improvement factor depends strongly on the local contrast ratio and also on the scatter-to-primary ratio. The SNR improvement factor is higher in the underpenetrated regions than in the well-penetrated regions of an image.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2215411     DOI: 10.1118/1.596496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of anti-scatter grids for digital imaging with use of a direct-conversion flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Masayoshi Mizuta; Shigeru Sanada; Hiroyuki Akazawa; Toshifumi Kasai; Shuji Abe; Yasuhiro Ikeno; Shigeki Mitou
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-10-05

2.  Investigation of optimum anti-scatter grid selection for digital radiography: physical imaging properties and detectability of low-contrast signals.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Kentaro Naka; Aya Saito; Junji Morishita; Fukai Toyofuku; Masafumi Ohki; Yoshiharu Higashida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-08-08

3.  Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.

Authors:  Xinming Liu; Chris C Shaw; Chao-Jen Lai; Tianpeng Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; G Avery; S Balcam; L Needler; A Smith; J R Saunderson; A W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Initial investigations of scatter cross-talk in simultaneous biplane high-speed 1000 frames per second neuro-angiography using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  J Troville; R S Dhonde; A Shields; S Rudin; D R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

6.  Scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR) implemented with an amorphous selenium flat-panel detector: initial experience.

Authors:  Xinming Liu; Chao-Jen Lai; Lingyun Chen; Tao Han; Yuncheng Zhong; Youtao Shen; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Investigation of grid performance using simple image quality tests.

Authors:  Dogan Bor; Ozlem Birgul; Umran Onal; Turan Olgar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  Antiscatter grid use in pediatric digital tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  Jenna M King; Idris A Elbakri; Martin Reed
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.