Literature DB >> 22148729

Effects of pH on proteins: predictions for ensemble and single-molecule pulling experiments.

Edward P O'Brien1, Bernard R Brooks, D Thirumalai.   

Abstract

Protein conformations change among distinct thermodynamic states as solution conditions (temperature, denaturants, pH) are altered or when they are subjected to mechanical forces. A quantitative description of the changes in the relative stabilities of the various thermodynamic states is needed to interpret and predict experimental outcomes. We provide a framework based on the Molecular Transfer Model (MTM) to account for pH effects on the properties of globular proteins. The MTM utilizes the partition function of a protein calculated from molecular simulations at one set of solution conditions to predict protein properties at another set of solution conditions. To take pH effects into account, we utilized experimentally measured pK(a) values in the native and unfolded states to calculate the free energy of transferring a protein from a reference pH to the pH of interest. We validate our approach by demonstrating that the native-state stability as a function of pH is accurately predicted for chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) and protein G. We use the MTM to predict the response of CI2 and protein G subjected to a constant force (f) and varying pH. The phase diagrams of CI2 and protein G as a function of f and pH are dramatically different and reflect the underlying pH-dependent stability changes in the absence of force. The calculated equilibrium free energy profiles as functions of the end-to-end distance of the two proteins show that, at various pH values, CI2 unfolds via an intermediate when subjected to f. The locations of the two transition states move toward the more unstable state as f is changed, which is in accord with the Hammond-Leffler postulate. In sharp contrast, force-induced unfolding of protein G occurs in a single step. Remarkably, the location of the transition state with respect to the folded state is independent of f, which suggests that protein G is mechanically brittle. The MTM provides a natural framework for predicting the outcomes of ensemble and single-molecule experiments for a wide range of solution conditions.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22148729      PMCID: PMC3262061          DOI: 10.1021/ja206557y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  54 in total

1.  Realistic modeling of the denatured states of proteins allows accurate calculations of the pH dependence of protein stability.

Authors:  A H Elcock
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  THE EFFECT OF COMPOUNDS OF THE UREA-GUANIDINIUM CLASS ON THE ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT OF ACETYLTETRAGLYCINE ETHYL ESTER AND RELATED COMPOUNDS.

Authors:  D R ROBINSON; W P JENCKS
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1965-06-05       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Temperature softening of a protein in single-molecule experiments.

Authors:  Michael Schlierf; Matthias Rief
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Characterizing the unfolded states of proteins using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and molecular simulations.

Authors:  Kusai A Merchant; Robert B Best; John M Louis; Irina V Gopich; William A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  pK(a) values for side-chain carboxyl groups of a PGB1 variant explain salt and pH-dependent stability.

Authors:  Stina Lindman; Sara Linse; Frans A A Mulder; Ingemar André
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition.

Authors:  S E Jackson; A R Fersht
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-10-29       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Parameters for the Description of Transition States.

Authors:  J E Leffler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.

Authors:  C Tanford
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1970

9.  Thermodynamics of the denaturation of lysozyme by guanidine hydrochloride. I. Depdendence on pH at 25 degrees.

Authors:  K C Aune; C Tanford
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Experimental pK(a) values of buried residues: analysis with continuum methods and role of water penetration.

Authors:  Carolyn A Fitch; Daniel A Karp; Kelly K Lee; Wesley E Stites; Eaton E Lattman; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  21 in total

1.  Denaturant-specific effects on the structural energetics of a protein-denatured ensemble.

Authors:  Mahdi Muhammad Moosa; Asha Z Goodman; Josephine C Ferreon; Chul Won Lee; Allan Chris M Ferreon; Ashok A Deniz
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Single-molecule FRET methods to study the dynamics of proteins at work.

Authors:  Hisham Mazal; Gilad Haran
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-08-23

3.  Exploring Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions with Coarse-Grained Protein Folding Models.

Authors:  Shuai Wei; Logan S Ahlstrom; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Small       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  Atomistic simulations indicate the functional loop-to-coiled-coil transition in influenza hemagglutinin is not downhill.

Authors:  Xingcheng Lin; Jeffrey K Noel; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiscale modeling of a conditionally disordered pH-sensing chaperone.

Authors:  Logan S Ahlstrom; Sean M Law; Alex Dickson; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Valproic Acid Thermally Destabilizes and Inhibits SpyCas9 Activity.

Authors:  Xinlai Cheng
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  pH Dependence of Charge Multipole Moments in Proteins.

Authors:  Anže Lošdorfer Božič; Rudolf Podgornik
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Quantifying charge state heterogeneity for proteins with multiple ionizable residues.

Authors:  Martin J Fossat; Ammon E Posey; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Capturing a Dynamic Chaperone-Substrate Interaction Using NMR-Informed Molecular Modeling.

Authors:  Loïc Salmon; Logan S Ahlstrom; Scott Horowitz; Alex Dickson; Charles L Brooks; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Poor Person's pH Simulation of Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Chitrak Gupta; Umesh Khaniya; John W Vant; Mrinal Shekhar; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Abhishek Singharoy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.