PURPOSE: To assess prospectively the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) with or without concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with histological proof of invasive localized NSCLC and evaluable tumour, and who were candidates for curative-intent radiochemotherapy (RCT) or RT were preincluded after providing written informed consent. Definitive inclusion was conditional upon significant FDG uptake before RT (PET₁). All included patients had a FDG PET/CT scan during RT (PET₂, mean dose 43 Gy) and were evaluated by FDG PET/CT at 3 months and 1 year after RT. The main endpoint was death (from whatever cause) or tumour progression at 1 year. RESULTS: Of 77 patients preincluded, 52 were evaluable. Among the evaluable patients, 77% received RT with induction chemotherapy and 73% RT with concomitant chemotherapy. At 1 year, 40 patients (77 %) had died or had tumour progression. No statistically significant association was found between stage (IIIB vs. other), histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs. other), induction or concomitant chemotherapy, and death/tumour progression at 1 year. The SUVmax in the PET2 scan was the single variable predictive of death or tumour progression at 1 year (odds ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.09, p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% CI 0.73 - 0.94, p < 10(-4)). A SUVmax value of 5.3 in the PET₂ scan yielded a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 92% for predicting tumour progression or death at 1 year. CONCLUSION: This prospective multicentre study demonstrated the prognostic value in terms of disease-free survival of SUVmax assessed during the 5th week of curative-intent RT or RCT in NSCLC patients (NCT01261598; RTEP2 study).
PURPOSE: To assess prospectively the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) with or without concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS:Patients with histological proof of invasive localized NSCLC and evaluable tumour, and who were candidates for curative-intent radiochemotherapy (RCT) or RT were preincluded after providing written informed consent. Definitive inclusion was conditional upon significant FDG uptake before RT (PET₁). All included patients had a FDG PET/CT scan during RT (PET₂, mean dose 43 Gy) and were evaluated by FDG PET/CT at 3 months and 1 year after RT. The main endpoint was death (from whatever cause) or tumour progression at 1 year. RESULTS: Of 77 patients preincluded, 52 were evaluable. Among the evaluable patients, 77% received RT with induction chemotherapy and 73% RT with concomitant chemotherapy. At 1 year, 40 patients (77 %) had died or had tumour progression. No statistically significant association was found between stage (IIIB vs. other), histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs. other), induction or concomitant chemotherapy, and death/tumour progression at 1 year. The SUVmax in the PET2 scan was the single variable predictive of death or tumour progression at 1 year (odds ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.09, p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% CI 0.73 - 0.94, p < 10(-4)). A SUVmax value of 5.3 in the PET₂ scan yielded a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 92% for predicting tumour progression or death at 1 year. CONCLUSION: This prospective multicentre study demonstrated the prognostic value in terms of disease-free survival of SUVmax assessed during the 5th week of curative-intent RT or RCT in NSCLCpatients (NCT01261598; RTEP2 study).
Authors: Ronald Boellaard; Wim J G Oyen; Corneline J Hoekstra; Otto S Hoekstra; Eric P Visser; Antoon T Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Josee Zijlstra; Anne M Paans; Emile F I Comans; Jan Pruim Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: M Vermandel; L Fin; S Hapdey; A Bol; N Betrouni; J Daouk; I Gardi; J Lee; R Jounwaz; J Rousseau; D Huglo Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Wouter van Elmpt; Michel Ollers; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wouter van Elmpt; Dirk De Ruysscher; Anke van der Salm; Annemarie Lakeman; Judith van der Stoep; Daisy Emans; Eugène Damen; Michel Öllers; Jan-Jakob Sonke; José Belderbos Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: H D Thames; T E Schultheiss; J H Hendry; S L Tucker; B M Dubray; W A Brock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1992 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Kirk A Frey; Leslie E Quint; Randall K Ten Haken; James A Hayman; Marc Kessler; Indrin J Chetty; Daniel Normolle; Avraham Eisbruch; Theodore S Lawrence Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lukas Käsmann; Maximilian Niyazi; Oliver Blanck; Christian Baues; René Baumann; Sophie Dobiasch; Chukwuka Eze; Daniel Fleischmann; Tobias Gauer; Frank A Giordano; Yvonne Goy; Jan Hausmann; Christoph Henkenberens; David Kaul; Lisa Klook; David Krug; Matthias Mäurer; Cédric M Panje; Johannes Rosenbrock; Lisa Sautter; Daniela Schmitt; Christoph Süß; Alexander H Thieme; Maike Trommer-Nestler; Sonia Ziegler; Nadja Ebert; Daniel Medenwald; Christian Ostheimer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 3.621