Literature DB >> 22142028

Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients.

Angela B Smith1, Mathew Raynor, Christopher L Amling, J Erik Busby, Erik Castle, Rodney Davis, Matthew Nielsen, Raju Thomas, Eric M Wallen, Michael Woods, Raj S Pruthi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, some surgeons have begun to describe single-institution case series with less invasive surgical approaches to bladder cancer such as laparoscopic or robotic-assisted techniques. We report on a multi-institutional, multi-surgeon experience with robotic radical cystectomy with regard to operative and pathologic outcomes and complications to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of this technique in a large cohort of patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients (178 males and 49 females) underwent a robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion at one of four institutions. Operative outcomes, pathological results, and complications of this combined case series are herein reported.
RESULTS: Mean age of this cohort was 67.1 years (range, 33-86 years) with a mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2.7 (range, 2-4). One hundred sixty-eight patients (74%) underwent ileal conduit diversion, 58 (26%) underwent orthotopic ileal neobladder, and 1 patient (<1%) had no diversion (end-stage renal disease). The urinary diversion was performed extracorporeally in 97% cases, with 7 patients (3%) undergoing an intracorporeal diversion. Mean operating room time of all patients was 5.5 hours, and mean surgical blood loss was 256 mL. On surgical pathology, 120 (53%) patients had pT2 or less disease, 35 (15%) had pT3/T4 disease, and 46 (20%) had N+ disease. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (range, 3-52). There was a positive surgical margin in 5 cases--all with pT3-4 disease. Mean time to discharge was 5.5 days (median, 5 days), with 70% of patients discharged on postoperative day 5 or sooner. Sixty-eight patients (30%) experienced complications, with 7% having Clavien grade 3 or higher. On multivariate analysis, decreased age and increased American Society of Anesthesiologists score were predictors of higher Clavien complication score, with younger patients more likely to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery.
CONCLUSION: A multi-institutional experience with robotic radical cystectomy appears to demonstrate acceptable operative and pathologic outcomes, thus helping to validate the previously reported single-institution case series. Ultimately, oncologic follow-up of these patients will remain as the most important measure of therapeutic success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22142028     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2011.0326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  18 in total

Review 1.  Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faris Azzouni
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: initial experience using the single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) technique.

Authors:  M Horstmann; M Kugler; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; T Herrmann; U Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Tips and tricks for intracorporeal robot-assisted urinary diversion.

Authors:  J W Collins; A Hosseini; P Sooriakumaran; T Nyberg; R Sanchez-Salas; C Adding; Martin C Schumacher; N P Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Raj Kurpad; Michael Woods; Raj Pruthi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.

Authors:  Karthik Tanneru; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Jatinder Kumar; Muhammad Umar Alam; Daniel Norez; Sabine Nguyen; Soroush Bazargani; Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi; Mark Bandyk; Robert Marino; Shahriar Koochekpour; Shiva Gautam; K C Balaji; Joseph Costa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-22

6.  Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Nguyen; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Xian Wu; Padraic O'Malley; Igor M Inoyatov; Abimbola Ayangbesan; Bishoy M Faltas; Paul J Christos; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  V-Loc urethro-intestinal anastomosis during robotic cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion.

Authors:  Khanh N Pham; Bryan S Sack; R Corey O'Connor; Michael L Guralnick; Peter Langenstroer; William A See; Kenneth Jacobsohn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Jonathan Silberstein; Gal E Keren Paz; S Machele Donat; Jonathan A Coleman; Sheila Mathew; Andrew Vickers; Geoffrey C Schnorr; Michael A Feuerstein; Bruce Rapkin; Raul O Parra; Harry W Herr; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  [Cystectomy in the elderly patient].

Authors:  G Bartsch; K Gust; S Vallo; C Bartsch; I Tsaur; J Mani; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Prevention and management of complications following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: lessons learned after >250 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Angela B Smith; Michael E Woods; Mathew C Raynor; Matthew E Nielsen; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.