Daniel P Nguyen1, Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh2, Xian Wu3, Padraic O'Malley2, Igor M Inoyatov2, Abimbola Ayangbesan2, Bishoy M Faltas4, Paul J Christos3, Douglas S Scherr2. 1. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: danielphatnguyen@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concerns remain whether robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compromises survival because of inadequate oncologic resection or alteration of recurrence patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe recurrence patterns following open radical cystectomy (ORC) and RARC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of 383 consecutive patients who underwent ORC (n=120) or RARC (n=263) at an academic institution from July 2001 to February 2014. INTERVENTION: ORC and RARC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Recurrence-free survival estimates were illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Recurrence patterns (local vs distant and anatomic locations) within 2 yr of surgery were tabulated. Cox regression models were built to evaluate the effect of surgical technique on the risk of recurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up time for patients without recurrence was 30 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 5-72) for ORC and 23 mo (IQR 9-48) for RARC (p=0.6). Within 2 yr of surgery, there was no large difference in the number of local recurrences between ORC and RARC patients (15/65 [23%] vs 24/136 [18%]), and the distribution of local recurrences was similar between the two groups. Similarly, the number of distant recurrences did not differ between the groups (26/73 [36%] vs 43/147 [29%]). However, there were distinct patterns of distant recurrence. Extrapelvic lymph node locations were more frequent for RARC than ORC (10/43 [23%] vs 4/26 [15%]). Furthermore, peritoneal carcinomatosis was found in 9/43 (21%) RARC patients compared to 2/26 (8%) ORC patients. In multivariable analyses, RARC was not a predictor of recurrence. Limitations of the study include selection bias and a limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Within limitations, we found that RARC is not an independent predictor of recurrence after surgery. Interestingly, extrapelvic lymph node locations and peritoneal carcinomatosis were more frequent in RARC than in ORC patients. Further validation is warranted to better understand the oncologic implications of RARC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, the locations of bladder cancer recurrences following conventional and robotic techniques for removal of the bladder are described. Although the numbers are small, the results show that the distribution of distant recurrences differs between the two techniques.
BACKGROUND: Concerns remain whether robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compromises survival because of inadequate oncologic resection or alteration of recurrence patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe recurrence patterns following open radical cystectomy (ORC) and RARC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of 383 consecutive patients who underwent ORC (n=120) or RARC (n=263) at an academic institution from July 2001 to February 2014. INTERVENTION: ORC and RARC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Recurrence-free survival estimates were illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Recurrence patterns (local vs distant and anatomic locations) within 2 yr of surgery were tabulated. Cox regression models were built to evaluate the effect of surgical technique on the risk of recurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up time for patients without recurrence was 30 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 5-72) for ORC and 23 mo (IQR 9-48) for RARC (p=0.6). Within 2 yr of surgery, there was no large difference in the number of local recurrences between ORC and RARC patients (15/65 [23%] vs 24/136 [18%]), and the distribution of local recurrences was similar between the two groups. Similarly, the number of distant recurrences did not differ between the groups (26/73 [36%] vs 43/147 [29%]). However, there were distinct patterns of distant recurrence. Extrapelvic lymph node locations were more frequent for RARC than ORC (10/43 [23%] vs 4/26 [15%]). Furthermore, peritoneal carcinomatosis was found in 9/43 (21%) RARC patients compared to 2/26 (8%) ORC patients. In multivariable analyses, RARC was not a predictor of recurrence. Limitations of the study include selection bias and a limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Within limitations, we found that RARC is not an independent predictor of recurrence after surgery. Interestingly, extrapelvic lymph node locations and peritoneal carcinomatosis were more frequent in RARC than in ORC patients. Further validation is warranted to better understand the oncologic implications of RARC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, the locations of bladder cancer recurrences following conventional and robotic techniques for removal of the bladder are described. Although the numbers are small, the results show that the distribution of distant recurrences differs between the two techniques.
Authors: Pascal Zehnder; Urs E Studer; Eila C Skinner; George N Thalmann; Gus Miranda; Beat Roth; Jie Cai; Frédéric D Birkhäuser; Anirban P Mitra; Fiona C Burkhard; Ryan P Dorin; Siamak Daneshmand; Donald G Skinner; Inderbir S Gill Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Evanguelos Xylinas; David A Green; Brandon Otto; Asha Jamzadeh; Luis Kluth; Richard K Lee; Brian D Robinson; Shahrokh F Shariat; Douglas S Scherr Journal: Urology Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Justin W Collins; Stavros Tyritzis; Tommy Nyberg; Martin Schumacher; Oscar Laurin; Dinyar Khazaeli; Christofer Adding; Martin N Jonsson; Abolfazl Hosseini; N Peter Wiklund Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Takehiro Iwata; Shoji Kimura; Beat Foerster; Nicola Fossati; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Kilian M Gust; Shin Egawa; Yasutomo Nasu; Mohammad Abufaraj; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Michael A Poch; Julio M Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Scott M Gilbert Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Andrea Necchi; Gregory R Pond; Marc C Smaldone; Sumanta K Pal; Kevin Chan; Yu-Ning Wong; Rosalia Viterbo; Guru Sonpavde; Lauren C Harshman; Simon Crabb; Ajjai Alva; Simon Chowdhury; Ugo De Giorgi; Sandy Srinivas; Neeraj Agarwal; Aristotelis Bamias; Jack Baniel; Ali-Reza Golshayan; Sylvain Ladoire; Cora N Sternberg; Linda Cerbone; Evan Y Yu; Joaquim Bellmunt; Ulka Vaishampayan; Gunter Niegisch; Syed Hussain; Daniel W Bowles; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Matthew I Milowsky; Christine Theodore; Dominik R Berthold; Srikala S Sridhar; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Matthew D Galsky Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2017-03-31
Authors: Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Karim H Marzouk; Daniel D Sjoberg; Justin Lee; Sheri M Donat; Jonathan A Coleman; Andrew Vickers; Harry W Herr; Vincent P Laudone Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Vivek Venkatramani; Isildinha M Reis; Erik P Castle; Mark L Gonzalgo; Michael E Woods; Robert S Svatek; Alon Z Weizer; Badrinath R Konety; Mathew Tollefson; Tracey L Krupski; Norm D Smith; Ahmad Shabsigh; Daniel A Barocas; Marcus L Quek; Atreya Dash; Adam S Kibel; Raj S Pruthi; Jeffrey Scott Montgomery; Christopher J Weight; David S Sharp; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Gopal N Gupta; Alex Gorbonos; Edward M Uchio; Eila Skinner; Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash; Maria F Becerra; Sanjaya Swain; Kerri Kendrick; Joseph A Smith; Ian M Thompson; Dipen J Parekh Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 7.450