Literature DB >> 24282453

V-Loc urethro-intestinal anastomosis during robotic cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion.

Khanh N Pham1, Bryan S Sack, R Corey O'Connor, Michael L Guralnick, Peter Langenstroer, William A See, Kenneth Jacobsohn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is an emerging minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. The V-loc (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) suture is a unidirectional barbed suture that provides even distribution of tension. We determined the rate of urinary leak at the urethro-intestinal anastomosis following orthotopic neobladder construction performed with V-loc suture.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts on all patients that underwent RARC with orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion performed with a V-loc suture from February 2010 to February 2012. The urethro-intestinal anastomosis was evaluated for urinary leak by cystogram at 3 to 4 weeks, postoperatively.
RESULTS: In total, 11 patients were available for analysis. The mean patient age was 57.2 years (range: 47-71). The average clinical follow-up was 8 months (range: 4-15). On surgical pathology, 8 (73%) patients had pT2 or less disease, 3 (27%) had pT3/T4 disease, and 1 (9%) had N+ disease. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 315 mL (range: 150-600) and the average operative time was 496 minutes (range: 485-519). No patient (0%) demonstrated a urinary leak at the urethro-intestinal anastomosis on postoperative cystogram. Eight patients (73%) were continent by 4 months, postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic neobladder urethro-intestinal anastomosis can be performed effectively and safely with V-loc suture with an acceptably low urinary leak rate.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24282453      PMCID: PMC3840523          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  12 in total

1.  Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients.

Authors:  Angela B Smith; Mathew Raynor; Christopher L Amling; J Erik Busby; Erik Castle; Rodney Davis; Matthew Nielsen; Raju Thomas; Eric M Wallen; Michael Woods; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute--lessons to be learned.

Authors:  Urs E Studer; Fiona C Burkhard; Martin Schumacher; Thomas M Kessler; Harriet Thoeny; Achim Fleischmann; George N Thalmann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Voiding dysfunction in the orthotopic neobladder.

Authors:  W D Steers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy.

Authors:  Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: mean followup of 18 months.

Authors:  Erik P Castle; Paul E Andrews; Nancy Itano; Donald E Novicki; Scott K Swanson; Robert G Ferrigni
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture.

Authors:  Jesse Sammon; Tae-Kyung Kim; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Akshay Bhandari; Sanjeev Kaul; Shyam Sukumar; Craig G Rogers; James O Peabody
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Robotic assisted radical cystectomy: short to medium-term oncologic and functional outcomes.

Authors:  P Dasgupta; P Rimington; D Murphy; B Challacombe; A Hemal; O Elhage; M S Khan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: "pure laparoscopic" and "open-assisted laparoscopic" approaches.

Authors:  Georges-Pascal Haber; Steven C Campbell; Jose R Colombo; Amr F Fergany; Monish Aron; Jihad Kaouk; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy.

Authors:  Gerald J Wang; Daniel A Barocas; Jay D Raman; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: operative and pathological outcomes.

Authors:  Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible.

Authors:  Luis C Fernandez; Augusto Toriz; Jorge Hernandez; Norberto Sanchez; Erick Linares; Massiel Zenteno; Adolfo Cuendis; Jose Olivares; Gustavo Guerrero; Cesar F Cervantes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Use of self-retaining barbed suture for rectal wall closure in transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  P Wilhelm; P Storz; S Axt; C Falch; A Kirschniak; S Muller
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.

Authors:  Karthik Tanneru; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Jatinder Kumar; Muhammad Umar Alam; Daniel Norez; Sabine Nguyen; Soroush Bazargani; Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi; Mark Bandyk; Robert Marino; Shahriar Koochekpour; Shiva Gautam; K C Balaji; Joseph Costa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-22

4.  A Novel Neobladder-Urethral Drag-and-Bond Anastomosis Technique During Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Ileal Orthotopic Neobladder: Surgical Technique and Initial Research.

Authors:  Zhaojun Yu; Jianbiao Huang; Huanhuan Deng; Zhihua Zeng; Leihong Deng; Xiangda Xu; Haichao Chao; Tao Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.