Literature DB >> 22847549

Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Faris Azzouni1.   

Abstract

Radical cystectomy is associated with significant morbidity. However, the introduction of minimally invasive surgical approaches has attempted to improve perioperative outcomes and decrease surgical complications. Emerging data suggest that robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) might have some advantages compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). However, the oncologic performance of RARC in patients with locally advanced disease is currently unclear, making it crucial to select patients for the procedure very carefully. No long-term prospective studies comparing the robot-assisted and open techniques have been reported. Until long-term oncologic outcomes of RARC and the results of currently ongoing randomized trials comparing the two techniques become available, ORC remains the gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22847549     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  64 in total

Review 1.  Robotics in urological surgery: review of current status and maneuverability, and comparison of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Iqbal Singh
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: an evidence based analysis.

Authors:  Elmar W Gerharz; Asa Månsson; Sonja Hunt; Eila C Skinner; Wiking Månsson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Robert S Svatek; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Eila Skinner; Vincenzo Ficarra; Yves Fradet; Yair Lotan; Hendrik Isbarn; Umberto Capitanio; Patrick J Bastian; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Jonathan I Izawa; Derya Tilki; Colin P Dinney; Seth P Lerner; Mark Schoenberg; Bjoern G Volkmer; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the montsouris experience after 84 cases.

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Carlos Arroyo; François Rozet; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  [Radical cystectomy and laparoscopic ileal conduit].

Authors:  E Sánchez de Badajoz; J L Gallego Perales; A Reche Rosado; J M Gutiérrez de la Cruz; A Jiménez Garrido
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 0.436

6.  Early oncologic outcomes of robotic vs. open radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Nepple; Seth A Strope; Robert L Grubb; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: intermediate survival results at a mean follow-up of 25 months.

Authors:  Aaron D Martin; Rafael N Nunez; Anna Pacelli; Michael E Woods; Rodney Davis; Raju Thomas; Paul E Andrews; Erik P Castle
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report.

Authors:  Harry Herr; Cheryl Lee; Sam Chang; Seth Lerner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Open laparoscopy.

Authors:  H M Hasson
Journal:  Biomed Bull       Date:  1984-08

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic intracorporeal urinary diversion.

Authors:  Raj S Pruthi; Jeff Nix; Dan McRackan; Adam Hickerson; Matthew E Nielsen; Matthew Raynor; Eric M Wallen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  1 in total

1.  Oncologic outcomes between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Leanne Almario; Hiwot Araya; Jonas Busch; Simon Conti; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.