Literature DB >> 22135352

A Bayesian antedependence model for whole genome prediction.

Wenzhao Yang1, Robert J Tempelman.   

Abstract

Hierarchical mixed effects models have been demonstrated to be powerful for predicting genomic merit of livestock and plants, on the basis of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker panels, and their use is being increasingly advocated for genomic predictions in human health. Two particularly popular approaches, labeled BayesA and BayesB, are based on specifying all SNP-associated effects to be independent of each other. BayesB extends BayesA by allowing a large proportion of SNP markers to be associated with null effects. We further extend these two models to specify SNP effects as being spatially correlated due to the chromosomally proximal effects of causal variants. These two models, that we respectively dub as ante-BayesA and ante-BayesB, are based on a first-order nonstationary antedependence specification between SNP effects. In a simulation study involving 20 replicate data sets, each analyzed at six different SNP marker densities with average LD levels ranging from r(2) = 0.15 to 0.31, the antedependence methods had significantly (P < 0.01) higher accuracies than their corresponding classical counterparts at higher LD levels (r(2) > 0. 24) with differences exceeding 3%. A cross-validation study was also conducted on the heterogeneous stock mice data resource (http://mus.well.ox.ac.uk/mouse/HS/) using 6-week body weights as the phenotype. The antedependence methods increased cross-validation prediction accuracies by up to 3.6% compared to their classical counterparts (P < 0.001). Finally, we applied our method to other benchmark data sets and demonstrated that the antedependence methods were more accurate than their classical counterparts for genomic predictions, even for individuals several generations beyond the training data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22135352      PMCID: PMC3316658          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.131540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  34 in total

1.  Comparing linkage disequilibrium-based methods for fine mapping quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  L Grapes; J C M Dekkers; M F Rothschild; R L Fernando
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice.

Authors:  William Valdar; Leah C Solberg; Dominique Gauguier; Stephanie Burnett; Paul Klenerman; William O Cookson; Martin S Taylor; J Nicholas P Rawlins; Richard Mott; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-09       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes.

Authors:  M P L Calus; T H E Meuwissen; A P W de Roos; R F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Characteristics of linkage disequilibrium in North American Holsteins.

Authors:  Jarmila Bohmanova; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Simulated data for genomic selection and genome-wide association studies using a combination of coalescent and gene drop methods.

Authors:  John M Hickey; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Simultaneous analysis of all SNPs in genome-wide and re-sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Clive J Hoggart; John C Whittaker; Maria De Iorio; David J Balding
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  33 in total

1.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome-Wide Association Analyses Based on Broadly Different Specifications for Prior Distributions, Genomic Windows, and Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Chunyu Chen; Juan P Steibel; Robert J Tempelman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic prediction of dichotomous traits with Bayesian logistic models.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Empirical Bayesian elastic net for multiple quantitative trait locus mapping.

Authors:  A Huang; S Xu; X Cai
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genomic prediction of agronomic traits in wheat using different models and cross-validation designs.

Authors:  Teketel A Haile; Sean Walkowiak; Amidou N'Diaye; John M Clarke; Pierre J Hucl; Richard D Cuthbert; Ron E Knox; Curtis J Pozniak
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Setting the standard: a special focus on genomic selection in GENETICS and G3.

Authors:  Dirk-Jan de Koning; Lauren McIntyre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Setting the Standard: A Special Focus on Genomic Selection in GENETICS and G3.

Authors:  Dirk-Jan de Koning; Lauren McIntyre
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genomic heritability: what is it?

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Daniel Sorensen; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Comparison of whole-genome prediction models for traits with contrasting genetic architecture in a diversity panel of maize inbred lines.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.