Literature DB >> 2213109

Pharmacodynamics in cancer therapy.

M J Ratain1, R L Schilsky, B A Conley, M J Egorin.   

Abstract

Our understanding of anticancer pharmacodynamics, and the relationships between pharmacologic measurements and clinical effects, has grown markedly in recent years due to advances in analytical and computational technology. Although methotrexate plasma levels have been empirically used to guide leucovorin dosing during high-dose methotrexate therapy, there has been no other standard use of therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology. More recently, investigators have attempted to titrate precisely the dose of antineoplastic agents based on previously derived models and real-time analysis of plasma drug or tissue concentrations. Studies have been completed or are in progress using hexamethylene bisacetamide, etoposide, teniposide, fluorouracil (FUra), and cytarabine (ara-C). Future studies will focus on optimal sampling strategies, analysis of intermediate biochemical end points, combination chemotherapy, modulation by colony-stimulating factors, and more sophisticated pharmacodynamic models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2213109     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.10.1739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  An interface model for dosage adjustment connects hematotoxicity to pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  C Meille; A Iliadis; D Barbolosi; N Frances; G Freyer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  The use of population pharmacokinetics in drug development.

Authors:  S Vozeh; J L Steimer; M Rowland; P Morselli; F Mentre; L P Balant; L Aarons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Precision Oncology Framework for Investigation of Exercise As Treatment for Cancer.

Authors:  Lee W Jones
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pharmacodynamics of three daily infusions of etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A A Miller; E A Tolley; H B Niell; C F Stewart; J P Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Pyrazine diazohydroxide (NSC-361456). Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  M V Dhodapkar; R L Richardson; J M Reid; M M Ames
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 9.  Toxicity patterns of cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  Etienne Chatelut; Jean-Pierre Delord; Pierre Canal
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Early tumor drug pharmacokinetics is influenced by tumor perfusion but not plasma drug exposure.

Authors:  Azeem Saleem; Pat M Price
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.