Azeem Saleem1, Pat M Price. 1. Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester. azeem.saleem@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma sampling are used as a surrogate of tumor pharmacokinetics. However, pharmacokinetics-modulating strategies do not always result in increased therapeutic efficacy. Nonsurrogacy of plasma kinetics may be due to tissue-specific factors such as tumor perfusion. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To assess the impact of tumor perfusion and plasma drug exposure on tumor pharmacokinetics, positron emission tomography studies were done with oxygen-15 radiolabeled water in 12 patients, with 6 patients undergoing positron emission tomography studies with carbon-11 radiolabeled N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide and the other 6 with fluorine-18 radiolabeled 5-fluorouracil. RESULTS: We found that tumor blood flow (mL blood/mL tissue/minute) was significantly correlated to early tumor radiotracer uptake between 4 and 6 minutes [standard uptake value (SUV)4-6; rho = 0.79; P = 0.002], tumor radiotracer exposure over 10 minutes [area under the time-activity curve (AUC)0-10; predominantly parent drug; rho = 0.86; P < 0.001], and tumor radiotracer exposure over 60 minutes (AUC0-60; predominantly radiolabeled metabolites; rho = 0.80; P = 0.002). Similarly, fractional volume of distribution of radiolabeled water in tumor (Vd) was significantly correlated with SUV4-6 (rho = 0.80; P = 0.002), AUC0-10 (rho = 0.85; P < 0.001), and AUC0-60 (rho = 0.66; P = 0.02). In contrast, no correlation was observed between plasma drug or total radiotracer exposure over 60 minutes and tumor drug uptake or exposure. Tumor blood flow was significantly correlated to Vd (rho = 0.69; P = 0.014), underlying the interdependence of tumor perfusion and Vd. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor perfusion is a key factor that influences tumor drug uptake/exposure. Tumor vasculature-targeting strategies may thus result in improved tumor drug exposure and therefore drug efficacy.
PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma sampling are used as a surrogate of tumor pharmacokinetics. However, pharmacokinetics-modulating strategies do not always result in increased therapeutic efficacy. Nonsurrogacy of plasma kinetics may be due to tissue-specific factors such as tumor perfusion. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To assess the impact of tumor perfusion and plasma drug exposure on tumor pharmacokinetics, positron emission tomography studies were done with oxygen-15 radiolabeled water in 12 patients, with 6 patients undergoing positron emission tomography studies with carbon-11 radiolabeled N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide and the other 6 with fluorine-18 radiolabeled 5-fluorouracil. RESULTS: We found that tumor blood flow (mL blood/mL tissue/minute) was significantly correlated to early tumor radiotracer uptake between 4 and 6 minutes [standard uptake value (SUV)4-6; rho = 0.79; P = 0.002], tumor radiotracer exposure over 10 minutes [area under the time-activity curve (AUC)0-10; predominantly parent drug; rho = 0.86; P < 0.001], and tumor radiotracer exposure over 60 minutes (AUC0-60; predominantly radiolabeled metabolites; rho = 0.80; P = 0.002). Similarly, fractional volume of distribution of radiolabeled water in tumor (Vd) was significantly correlated with SUV4-6 (rho = 0.80; P = 0.002), AUC0-10 (rho = 0.85; P < 0.001), and AUC0-60 (rho = 0.66; P = 0.02). In contrast, no correlation was observed between plasma drug or total radiotracer exposure over 60 minutes and tumor drug uptake or exposure. Tumor blood flow was significantly correlated to Vd (rho = 0.69; P = 0.014), underlying the interdependence of tumor perfusion and Vd. CONCLUSIONS:Tumor perfusion is a key factor that influences tumor drug uptake/exposure. Tumor vasculature-targeting strategies may thus result in improved tumor drug exposure and therefore drug efficacy.
Authors: A Saleem; R J Harte; J C Matthews; S Osman; F Brady; S K Luthra; G D Brown; N Bleehen; T Connors; T Jones; P M Price; E O Aboagye Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D Front; O Israel; G Iosilevsky; E Even-Sapir; A Frenkel; H Peleg; M Steiner; A Kuten; G M Kolodny Journal: Radiology Date: 1987-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A Saleem; J Yap; S Osman; F Brady; B Suttle; S V Lucas; T Jones; P M Price; E O Aboagye Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-06-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R J Harte; J C Matthews; S M O'Reilly; D W Tilsley; S Osman; G Brown; S J Luthra; F Brady; T Jones; P M Price Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Nishi Gupta; Azeem Saleem; Barbara Kötz; Safiye Osman; Eric O Aboagye; Robert Phillips; Clare Vernon; Harpreet Wasan; Terry Jones; Peter J Hoskin; Patricia M Price Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ruud P M Dings; Melissa L Loren; Yan Zhang; Sterling Mikkelson; Kevin H Mayo; Peter Corry; Robert J Griffin Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Prashant B Nigade; Jayasagar Gundu; K Sreedhara Pai; Kumar V S Nemmani Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: Katherine D Watson; Xiaowen Hu; Chun-Yen Lai; Heather A Lindfors; Dana D Hu-Lowe; Theresa A Tuthill; David R Shalinsky; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 2.998