Literature DB >> 22130093

New variants at 10q26 and 15q21 are associated with aggressive prostate cancer in a genome-wide association study from a prostate biopsy screening cohort.

Robert K Nam1, William Zhang, Katherine Siminovitch, Adam Shlien, Michael W Kattan, Laurence H Klotz, John Trachtenberg, Yan Lu, Jinyi Zhang, Changhong Yu, Ants Toi, D Andrew Loblaw, Vasundara Venkateswaran, Aleksandra Stanimirovic, Linda Sugar, David Malkin, Arun Seth, Steven A Narod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify and examine polymorphisms of genes associated with aggressive and clinical significant forms of prostate cancer among a screening cohort. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We conducted a genome-wide association study among patients with aggressive forms of prostate cancer and biopsy-proven normal controls ascertained from a prostate cancer screening program. We then examined significant associations of specific polymorphisms among a prostate cancer screened cohort to examine their predictive ability in detecting prostate cancer.
RESULTS: We found significant associations between aggressive prostate cancer and five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 10q26 (rs10788165, rs10749408, and rs10788165, p value for association 1.3 × 10(-10 ) to 3.2 × 10(-11) ) and 15q21 (rs4775302 and rs1994198, p values for association 3.1 × 10(-8 ) to 8.2 × 10(-9)) regions. Results of a replication study done in 3439 patients undergoing a prostate biopsy, revealed certain combinations of these SNPs to be significantly associated not only with prostate cancer but with aggressive forms of prostate cancer using an established classification criterion for prostate cancer progression (odds ratios for intermediate to high-risk disease 1.8-3.0, p value 0.003-0.001). These SNP combinations were also important clinical predictors for prostate cancer detection based on nomogram analysis that assesses prostate cancer risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Five SNPs were found to be associated with aggressive forms of prostate cancer. We demonstrated potential clinical applications of these associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130093      PMCID: PMC3280918          DOI: 10.4161/cbt.12.11.18366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  21 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease.

Authors:  Kirk E Lohmueller; Celeste L Pearce; Malcolm Pike; Eric S Lander; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Beyond odds ratios--communicating disease risk based on genetic profiles.

Authors:  Peter Kraft; Sholom Wacholder; Marilyn C Cornelis; Frank B Hu; Richard B Hayes; Gilles Thomas; Robert Hoover; David J Hunter; Stephen Chanock
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Curses--winner's and otherwise--in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  Peter Kraft
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24.

Authors:  Meredith Yeager; Nick Orr; Richard B Hayes; Kevin B Jacobs; Peter Kraft; Sholom Wacholder; Mark J Minichiello; Paul Fearnhead; Kai Yu; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Zhaoming Wang; Robert Welch; Brian J Staats; Eugenia E Calle; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael J Thun; Carmen Rodriguez; Demetrius Albanes; Jarmo Virtamo; Stephanie Weinstein; Fredrick R Schumacher; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Olivier Cussenot; Antoine Valeri; Gerald L Andriole; Edward P Gelmann; Margaret Tucker; Daniela S Gerhard; Joseph F Fraumeni; Robert Hoover; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock; Gilles Thomas
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A novel member of the WD-repeat gene family, WDR11, maps to the 10q26 region and is disrupted by a chromosome translocation in human glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  O B Chernova; A Hunyadi; E Malaj; H Pan; C Crooks; B Roe; J K Cowell
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Established prostate cancer susceptibility variants are not associated with disease outcome.

Authors:  Fredrik E Wiklund; Hans-Olov Adami; Sigun L Zheng; Pär Stattin; William B Isaacs; Henrik Grönberg; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Utility of incorporating genetic variants for the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert K Nam; William W Zhang; John Trachtenberg; Arun Seth; Laurence H Klotz; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Sanoj Punnen; Vasundara Venkateswaran; Ants Toi; D Andrew Loblaw; Linda Sugar; Katherine A Siminovitch; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Genetic variants in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) contribute to susceptibility of breast cancer in Chinese women.

Authors:  Jie Liang; Peizhan Chen; Zhibin Hu; Xiaoyi Zhou; Lu Chen; Mian Li; Yan Wang; Jinhai Tang; Hui Wang; Hongbing Shen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Individual and cumulative effect of prostate cancer risk-associated variants on clinicopathologic variables in 5,895 prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  A Karim Kader; Jielin Sun; Sarah D Isaacs; Kathleen E Wiley; Guifang Yan; Seong-Tae Kim; Helen Fedor; Angelo M DeMarzo; Jonathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Bruce Trock; S Lilly Zheng; Jianfeng Xu; William Isaacs
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Evaluation of 8q24 and 17q risk loci and prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  Kathryn L Penney; Claudia A Salinas; Mark Pomerantz; Fredrick R Schumacher; Christine A Beckwith; Gwo-Shu Lee; William K Oh; Oliver Sartor; Elaine A Ostrander; Tobias Kurth; Jing Ma; Lorelei Mucci; Janet L Stanford; Philip W Kantoff; David J Hunter; Meir J Stampfer; Matthew L Freedman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Restoring TGFβ1 pathway-related microRNAs: possible impact in metastatic prostate cancer development.

Authors:  Juliana Inês Santos; Ana Luísa Teixeira; Francisca Dias; Mónica Gomes; Augusto Nogueira; Joana Assis; Rui Medeiros
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-25

2.  Associations of prostate cancer risk variants with disease aggressiveness: results of the NCI-SPORE Genetics Working Group analysis of 18,343 cases.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; Kimberly A Roehl; Phillip R Cooper; Barry B McGuire; Liesel M Fitzgerald; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Scott Bauer; Erin L Van Blarigan; Xin Chen; David Duggan; Elaine A Ostrander; Mary Gwo-Shu; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Shen-Chih Chang; Somee Jeong; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Gary Smith; James L Mohler; Sonja I Berndt; Shannon K McDonnell; Rick Kittles; Benjamin A Rybicki; Matthew Freedman; Philip W Kantoff; Mark Pomerantz; Joan P Breyer; Jeffrey R Smith; Timothy R Rebbeck; Dan Mercola; William B Isaacs; Fredrick Wiklund; Olivier Cussenot; Stephen N Thibodeau; Daniel J Schaid; Lisa Cannon-Albright; Kathleen A Cooney; Stephen J Chanock; Janet L Stanford; June M Chan; John Witte; Jianfeng Xu; Jeannette T Bensen; Jack A Taylor; William J Catalona
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Coexpression and expression quantitative trait loci analyses of the angiogenesis gene-gene interaction network in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hui-Yi Lin; Chia-Ho Cheng; Dung-Tsa Chen; Y Ann Chen; Jong Y Park
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  The prostate cancer susceptibility variant rs2735839 near KLK3 gene is associated with aggressive prostate cancer and can stratify gleason score 7 patients.

Authors:  Jeri Kim; Xifeng Wu; Yonggang He; Jian Gu; Sara Strom; Christopher J Logothetis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Sleeping Beauty transposon system for genetic etiological research and gene therapy of cancers.

Authors:  Xiaomei Hou; Yan Du; Yang Deng; Jianfeng Wu; Guangwen Cao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 6.  Genome-wide association studies in Africans and African Americans: expanding the framework of the genomics of human traits and disease.

Authors:  Emmanuel Peprah; Huichun Xu; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Charmaine D Royal
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Inherited susceptibility for aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  William B Isaacs
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Gene variants in the angiogenesis pathway and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ernest K Amankwah; Thomas A Sellers; Jong Y Park
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Genetic variation in prostate-specific antigen-detected prostate cancer and the effect of control selection on genetic association studies.

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Mark Lathrop; Richard M Martin; Duleeka W Knipe; David M Evans; John P Kemp; Rosalind Eeles; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Genome-wide association studies on prostate cancer: the end or the beginning?

Authors:  Rui Chen; Shancheng Ren; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 14.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.