PURPOSE: Variants at chromosomal loci 8q24 and 17q are established risk factors for prostate cancer. Many studies have confirmed the findings for risk, but few have examined aggressiveness and other clinical variables in detail. Additionally, Gleason score is typically used as a surrogate for the primary end point of prostate cancer mortality. We investigated whether the 8q24 and 17q risk variants are associated with clinical variables as well as prostate cancer mortality. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the Physicians' Health Study (1,347 cases and 1,462 controls), the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence (Gelb Center; 3,714 cases), and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center King County Case-Control Studies (1,308 cases and 1,266 controls), we examined eight previously identified 8q24 and 17q risk variants for association with prostate cancer mortality in men of European ancestry. We considered associations with other surrogate markers of prostate cancer aggressiveness, such as Gleason score, pathologic stage, prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, and age at diagnosis. RESULTS: Six of the eight variants were confirmed as prostate cancer risk factors. Several variants were nominally associated with age at diagnosis; when totaling all alleles for single nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with risk, each additional allele decreased age at diagnosis by an average of 6 months in the Physicians' Health Study (P = 0.0005) and 4 months in the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence (Gelb Center) cohort (P = 0.0016). However, there were no statistically significant associations with prostate cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the 8q24 and 17q prostate cancer risk variants may influence age at diagnosis but not disease aggressiveness.
PURPOSE: Variants at chromosomal loci 8q24 and 17q are established risk factors for prostate cancer. Many studies have confirmed the findings for risk, but few have examined aggressiveness and other clinical variables in detail. Additionally, Gleason score is typically used as a surrogate for the primary end point of prostate cancer mortality. We investigated whether the 8q24 and 17q risk variants are associated with clinical variables as well as prostate cancer mortality. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the Physicians' Health Study (1,347 cases and 1,462 controls), the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence (Gelb Center; 3,714 cases), and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center King County Case-Control Studies (1,308 cases and 1,266 controls), we examined eight previously identified 8q24 and 17q risk variants for association with prostate cancer mortality in men of European ancestry. We considered associations with other surrogate markers of prostate cancer aggressiveness, such as Gleason score, pathologic stage, prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, and age at diagnosis. RESULTS: Six of the eight variants were confirmed as prostate cancer risk factors. Several variants were nominally associated with age at diagnosis; when totaling all alleles for single nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with risk, each additional allele decreased age at diagnosis by an average of 6 months in the Physicians' Health Study (P = 0.0005) and 4 months in the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence (Gelb Center) cohort (P = 0.0016). However, there were no statistically significant associations with prostate cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the 8q24 and 17q prostate cancer risk variants may influence age at diagnosis but not disease aggressiveness.
Authors: Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Hans Garmo; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Bo Johan Norlén; Jan-Erik Johansson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Lilly Zheng; Jielin Sun; Fredrik Wiklund; Shelly Smith; Pär Stattin; Ge Li; Hans-Olov Adami; Fang-Chi Hsu; Yi Zhu; Katarina Bälter; A Karim Kader; Aubrey R Turner; Wennuan Liu; Eugene R Bleecker; Deborah A Meyers; David Duggan; John D Carpten; Bao-Li Chang; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu; Henrik Grönberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J S Witte; K A Goddard; D V Conti; R C Elston; J Lin; B K Suarez; K W Broman; J K Burmester; J L Weber; W J Catalona Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2000-05-24 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; George H Barrows; David F Penson; Pam D H Kowalczyk; M Melinda Sanders; Judith Fine Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-09-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Susan L Slager; Katherine E Zarfas; W Mark Brown; Ethan M Lange; Shannon K McDonnell; Kirk J Wojno; Kathleen A Cooney Journal: Prostate Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Jianfeng Xu; Sarah D Isaacs; Jielin Sun; Ge Li; Kathleen E Wiley; Yi Zhu; Fang-Chi Hsu; Fredrik Wiklund; Aubrey R Turner; Tamara S Adams; Wennuan Liu; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Baoli Chang; Patrick C Walsh; Henrik Grönberg; William Isaacs; Siqun Zheng Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sarah M Troutman; Tristan M Sissung; Cheryl D Cropp; David J Venzon; Shawn D Spencer; Bamidele A Adesunloye; Xuan Huang; Fatima H Karzai; Douglas K Price; William D Figg Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-03-01
Authors: Ana S Branković; Goran N Brajušković; Jovan D Mirčetić; Zorana Z Nikolić; Predrag B Kalaba; Vinka D Vukotić; Saša M Tomović; Snežana J Cerović; Zoran A Radojičić; Dušanka L J Savić-Pavićević; Stanka P Romac Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Irene M Shui; Sara Lindström; Adam S Kibel; Sonja I Berndt; Daniele Campa; Travis Gerke; Kathryn L Penney; Demetrius Albanes; Christine Berg; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Stephen Chanock; E David Crawford; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; J Michael Gaziano; Graham G Giles; Brian Henderson; Robert Hoover; Mattias Johansson; Loic Le Marchand; Jing Ma; Carmen Navarro; Kim Overvad; Fredrick R Schumacher; Gianluca Severi; Afshan Siddiq; Meir Stampfer; Victoria L Stevens; Ruth C Travis; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Paolo Vineis; Lorelei A Mucci; Meredith Yeager; Edward Giovannucci; Peter Kraft Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Robert K Nam; William Zhang; Katherine Siminovitch; Adam Shlien; Michael W Kattan; Laurence H Klotz; John Trachtenberg; Yan Lu; Jinyi Zhang; Changhong Yu; Ants Toi; D Andrew Loblaw; Vasundara Venkateswaran; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Linda Sugar; David Malkin; Arun Seth; Steven A Narod Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Mark M Pomerantz; Lillian Werner; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Tong Sun; Carolyn Evan; Gillian Petrozziello; Mari Nakabayashi; William K Oh; Philip W Kantoff; Matthew L Freedman Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-03-02
Authors: Tong Sun; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Lillian Werner; Mark Pomerantz; William K Oh; Philip W Kantoff; Matthew L Freedman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Eric J Whitman; Mark Pomerantz; Yongmei Chen; Michael M Chamberlin; Bungo Furusato; Chunling Gao; Amina Ali; Lakshmi Ravindranath; Albert Dobi; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Isabell A Sestrehenn; David G McLeod; Shiv Srivastava; Matthew Freedman; Gyorgy Petrovics Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.254