| Literature DB >> 19238176 |
Peter Kraft1, Sholom Wacholder, Marilyn C Cornelis, Frank B Hu, Richard B Hayes, Gilles Thomas, Robert Hoover, David J Hunter, Stephen Chanock.
Abstract
The brisk discovery of novel inherited disease markers by genome-wide association (GWA) studies has raised expectations for predicting disease risk by analysing multiple common alleles. However, the statistics used during the discovery phase of research (such as odds ratios or p values for association) are not the most appropriate measures for evaluating the predictive value of genetic profiles. We argue that other measures--such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values--are more useful when proposing a genetic profile for risk prediction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19238176 DOI: 10.1038/nrg2516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Rev Genet ISSN: 1471-0056 Impact factor: 53.242