Literature DB >> 22129366

Effects of vocoding and intelligibility on the cerebral response to speech.

Kuzma Strelnikov1, Zoé Massida, Julien Rouger, Pascal Belin, Pascal Barone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Degrading speech through an electronic synthesis technique called vocoding has been shown to affect cerebral processing of speech in several cortical areas. However, it is not clear whether the effects of speech degradation by vocoding are related to acoustical degradation or by the associated loss in intelligibility. Using vocoding and a parametric variation of the number of frequency bands used for the encoding, we investigated the effects of the degradation of auditory spectral content on cerebral processing of intelligible speech (words), unintelligible speech (words in a foreign language), and complex environmental sounds.
RESULTS: Vocoding was found to decrease activity to a comparable degree for intelligible and unintelligible speech in most of the temporal lobe. Only the bilateral posterior temporal areas showed a significant interaction between vocoding and intelligibility, with a stronger vocoding-induced decrease in activity for intelligible speech. Comparisons to responses elicited by environmental sounds showed that portions of the temporal voice areas (TVA) retained their greater responses to voice even under adverse listening conditions. The recruitment of specific networks in temporal regions during exposure to degraded speech follows a radial and anterior-posterior topography compared to the networks recruited by exposure to speech that is not degraded.
CONCLUSIONS: Different brain networks are involved in vocoded sound processing of intelligible speech, unintelligible speech, and non-vocal sounds. The greatest differences are between speech and environmental sounds, which could be related to the distinctive temporal structure of speech sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22129366      PMCID: PMC3247873          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Neurosci        ISSN: 1471-2202            Impact factor:   3.288


  22 in total

1.  Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  A L Giraud; E Truy; R S Frackowiak; M C Grégoire; J F Pujol; L Collet
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe.

Authors:  S K Scott; C C Blank; S Rosen; R J Wise
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

4.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Daniel Pressnitzer; Julie Bestel; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or nucleus cochlear implant.

Authors:  R S Tyler; A J Parkinson; G G Woodworth; M W Lowder; B J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Human temporal-lobe response to vocal sounds.

Authors:  Pascal Belin; Robert J Zatorre; Pierre Ahad
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-02

9.  Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI.

Authors:  C Narain; Sophie K Scott; Richard J S Wise; Stuart Rosen; Alexander Leff; S D Iversen; P M Matthews
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech--a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Stuart Rosen; Harriet Lang; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Intensity patterns at the peaks of brain activity in fMRI and PET are highly correlated with neural models of spatial integration.

Authors:  Amirouche Sadoun; Tushar Chauhan; Yi Fan Zhang; Yohan Gallois; Mathieu Marx; Olivier Deguine; Pascal Barone; Kuzma Strelnikov
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.698

2.  Brain voice processing with bilateral cochlear implants: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Arnaud Coez; Monica Zilbovicius; Evelyne Ferrary; Didier Bouccara; Isabelle Mosnier; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Eric Bizaguet; Jean-Luc Martinot; Yves Samson; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Stable modality-specific activity flows as reflected by the neuroenergetic approach to the FMRI weighted maps.

Authors:  Kuzma Strelnikov; Pascal Barone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differently.

Authors:  Anne Hauswald; Anne Keitel; Ya-Ping Chen; Sebastian Rösch; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.698

5.  A semi-supervised Support Vector Machine model for predicting the language outcomes following cochlear implantation based on pre-implant brain fMRI imaging.

Authors:  Lirong Tan; Scott K Holland; Aniruddha K Deshpande; Ye Chen; Daniel I Choo; Long J Lu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.