Literature DB >> 10869051

Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients.

A L Giraud1, E Truy, R S Frackowiak, M C Grégoire, J F Pujol, L Collet.   

Abstract

Differences in cerebral activation between control subjects and post-lingually deaf rehabilitated cochlear implant patients were identified with PET under various speech conditions of different linguistic complexity. Despite almost similar performance in patients and controls, different brain activation patterns were elicited. In patients, an attentional network including prefrontal and parietal modality-aspecific attentional regions and subcortical auditory regions was over-activated irrespective of the nature of the speech stimuli and during expectancy of speech stimuli. A left temporoparietal semantic region was responsive to meaningless stimuli (vowels). In response to meaningful stimuli (words, sentences, story), left middle and inferior temporal semantic regions and posterior superior temporal phonological regions were under-activated in patients, whereas anterior superior temporal phonological regions were over-activated. These differences in the recruitment of the speech comprehension system reflect the alternative neural strategies that permit speech comprehension after cochlear implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10869051     DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.7.1391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  28 in total

1.  Demand on verbal working memory delays haemodynamic response in the inferior prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Guillaume Thierry; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-François Démonet; Dominique Cardebat
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension.

Authors:  Evelyn C Ferstl; Jane Neumann; Carsten Bogler; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Lauri Parkkonen; Nobuya Fujiki; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neural mechanisms of discourse comprehension: a human lesion study.

Authors:  Aron K Barbey; Roberto Colom; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Nicole K Speer; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Auditory cortical activity during cochlear implant-mediated perception of spoken language, melody, and rhythm.

Authors:  Charles J Limb; Anne T Molloy; Patpong Jiradejvong; Allen R Braun
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-07

10.  Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger Land; Peter Baumhoff; Jochen Tillein; Stephen G Lomber; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.