Literature DB >> 22125574

People Use their Knowledge of Common Events to Understand Language, and Do So as Quickly as Possible.

Ken McRae1, Kazunaga Matsuki.   

Abstract

People possess a great deal of knowledge about how the world works, and it is undoubtedly true that adults use this knowledge when understanding and producing language. However, psycholinguistic theories differ regarding whether this extra-linguistic pragmatic knowledge can be activated and used immediately, or only after a delay. The authors present research that investigates whether people immediately use their generalized knowledge of common events when understanding language. This research demonstrates that (i) individual isolated words immediately activate event-based knowledge; (ii) combinations of words in sentences immediately constrain people's event-based expectations for concepts that are upcoming in language; (iii) syntax modulates people's expectations for ensuing concepts; and (iv) event-based knowledge can produce expectations for ensuing syntactic structures. It is concluded that theories of sentence comprehension must allow for the rapid dynamic interplay among these sources of information.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22125574      PMCID: PMC3224485          DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass        ISSN: 1749-818X


  24 in total

1.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Tracy Chow; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Christoph Scheepers; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  How does verb aspect constrain event representations?

Authors:  Carol J Madden; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

4.  Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort; Lea Hald; Marcel Bastiaansen; Karl Magnus Petersson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge.

Authors:  Todd R Ferretti; Marta Kutas; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

10.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns.

Authors:  Ken McRae; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Todd Ferretti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10
View more
  23 in total

1.  Looking for a Location: Dissociated Effects of Event-Related Plausibility and Verb-Argument Information on Predictive Processing in Aphasia.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hayes; Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Thematic and other semantic relations central to abstract (and concrete) concepts.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Ken McRae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-11

3.  A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Trevor Brothers; Edward W Wlotko
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.

Authors:  Ross Metusalem; Marta Kutas; Thomas P Urbach; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Developmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Angele Yazbec; Michael P Kaschak; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

7.  The influence of event-related knowledge on verb-argument processing in aphasia.

Authors:  Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.

Authors:  Kathryn Bousquet; Tamara Y Swaab; Debra L Long
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Comprehending the impossible: what role do selectional restriction violations play?

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Evelyn Milburn; Nikole D Patson; Michael Walsh Dickey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.